Urda rail crash thread disappears and is restored by its author
Can a user delete an entire forum thread without anyone noticing until the gap shows up in the topic list? According to what was reported on the forum itself, yes. And that is what peine with the thread tracking the Urda rail crash in Spain, where a Renfe train ploughed into an Iryo train. The thread, which had been drawing heavy traffic for days, vanished overnight. The first theories were not technical: people talked about a phone call from Moncloa (the Spanish PM's office), about censorship, and about an invisible finger pressing the delete button. The real explanation, according to the thread's author, was more prosaic and stranger at the same time.
What peine to the Urda crash thread
The thread's creator said he deleted it himself. It was not a moderator, not a server outage, not a government order. He did it, by his own account, because the forum admin had edited his opening post and inserted text that was not his. The author, visibly annoyed, took the quick route: deleting the entire thread. Hours later, the admin himself restored it, "just because", with no further explanation.
The sequence revealed a technical detail few people knew: **a user can delete their own threads without moderator intervention**. That turns any tantrum into a hole in the forum's archive. And in a topic with active coverage of an ongoing event, that hole is noticeable.
The update that broke mobile and half the forum
The technical context points to an automatic update rolled out in the early hours, according to accounts posted in the thread. That update **made posting from mobile nearly impossible** and, along the way, is said to have affected part of the server, according to the same accounts. The admin had reportedly been tweaking code at three in the morning to fix one problem and created another. The coincidence with the thread's deletion set off every alarm.
Some maintain the deletion was simply the author's decision. Against that stands the fact that the admin had edited the original post, which makes the reaction a protest rather than a whim. The end result is the same: the thread is back, but trust in the forum's infrastructure took a hit.
The Urda crash: what the thread was covering
The event being tracked was a collision between a Renfe train and an Iryo train in Urda, with the former ramming the latter **at more than 100 kilometres per hour**, according to a post in the thread. The thread had been gathering information about the crash and its aftermath. Its temporary disappearance cut short the continuity of a topic that, by its nature, demands constant updates.
The anecdote of the day came from a post that summed up the mood: in a matter of hours, the admin went from being branded a censor to being the restorer of the very content in question. The irony was claimed by the author of the deletion himself, who made it clear who had done what.
In the end, the thread is back. The crash is still there. And the next time someone deletes a topic with active coverage, the question will no longer be who did it, but how long it takes for the gap to show up.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (34 replies).
A thread of 3,000 messages about a rail accident in Urda, Spain, disappeared and reappeared twice in under an hour, according to participants. No one offered…
Debate on inherited problems and trains: if another train derails under another government, the previous one will be to blame. And the cost will fall on everyone.
A tweet shows a protest outside Spain's Ministry of Transport. The gesture sums up the political battle over rail management and its costs. Here is what lies behind it.
Four of the seven trains that detect micro-cracks have been idle for two years, according to the figure circulating. The debate between sabotage and decay of Spain's rail network.
A Renfe train ran a red signal and hit an Iryo train in Urda, Spain. The government points to human error, but the safety system did not brake. 46 dead.