UK slaps multi-million fine on US mental health forum over VPN access
The UK government has fined a US-based mental health forum millions. Could this set a precedent for sanctioning websites in other countries? A legal and political analysis.
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
Extraterritorial fines on forums: can a government sanction a website in another country?
On March 12, the British government imposed a multi-million fine on a US-based mental health forum. The reasoning: its citizens could access the site using a VPN. The unprecedented sanction opens the door to a scenario of global digital control where jurisdiction no longer matters. Could the same happen in Spain with forums like the one hosting this very discussion?
The British precedent: a fine with no leg to stand on
In the UK, the regulatory authority has penalized an American website for allowing British users with a VPN to access mental health content. Legal analysts have called the decision "absurd," recalling the principle of territoriality: a country's laws do not apply to companies in another jurisdiction. "It's as if Saudi Arabia fined a Spanish Catholic website because people with a VPN can view blasphemous content," noted one participant in the discussion. The United States, moreover, protects freedom of speech under its First Amendment, which makes enforcing such a fine a dead letter.
The DSA and Internet control in the EU
The European Digital Services Act (DSA) introduces mechanisms allowing member states to block foreign websites that abusa their rules. However, its extraterritorial reach is limited: it cannot fine the forum itself, but rather order European internet providers to block access. As argued in the discussion, "an EU judge cannot lay a hand on a server in Miami." The DSA only works if the forum has representation in the EU or if the owner cooperates. Otherwise, blocking is the only real tool, and VPNs easily circumvent it.
The Spanish case: a real risk for local forums?
The discussion highlighted a relevant fact: the forum's administrator has already handed over users' IP addresses to private agencies without a court order. This suggests that, under legal pressure, he might cooperate with the authorities. Still, as long as the forum is hosted in the US or in a country with strong legal protections, a Spanish fine would be impossible to collect. "To collect it, they'd have to go before an American judge who would politely tell them to shove it," one commenter summed up.
Privacy and VPNs: resistance's days are numbered
Skepticism dominates the analysis: total anonymity is practically impossible, but tools like VPNs and Tor still work. However, it was pointed out that "if the government is determined, it will eventually catch whoever it's looking for." The key lies in user discipline and in how laws evolve. For now, the social credit system some antiestéticar has not reached the West, but every extraterritorial fine paves the way.
What the discussion makes clear is that the state does not yet have effective tools to sanction foreign forums, but the DSA and other legal frameworks are heading in that direction. The open question: how long will it be before a government decides to block an inconvenient forum and VPNs stop being an option?
Related discussions on the forum
On March 12, the British government imposed a multi-million fine on a US-based mental health forum. The reasoning: its citizens could access the site using a VPN. The unprecedented sanction opens the door to a scenario of global digital control where jurisdiction no longer matters. Could the same happen in Spain with forums like the one hosting this very discussion?
The British precedent: a fine with no leg to stand on
In the UK, the regulatory authority has penalized an American website for allowing British users with a VPN to access mental health content. Legal analysts have called the decision "absurd," recalling the principle of territoriality: a country's laws do not apply to companies in another jurisdiction. "It's as if Saudi Arabia fined a Spanish Catholic website because people with a VPN can view blasphemous content," noted one participant in the discussion. The United States, moreover, protects freedom of speech under its First Amendment, which makes enforcing such a fine a dead letter.
The DSA and Internet control in the EU
The European Digital Services Act (DSA) introduces mechanisms allowing member states to block foreign websites that abusa their rules. However, its extraterritorial reach is limited: it cannot fine the forum itself, but rather order European internet providers to block access. As argued in the discussion, "an EU judge cannot lay a hand on a server in Miami." The DSA only works if the forum has representation in the EU or if the owner cooperates. Otherwise, blocking is the only real tool, and VPNs easily circumvent it.
The Spanish case: a real risk for local forums?
The discussion highlighted a relevant fact: the forum's administrator has already handed over users' IP addresses to private agencies without a court order. This suggests that, under legal pressure, he might cooperate with the authorities. Still, as long as the forum is hosted in the US or in a country with strong legal protections, a Spanish fine would be impossible to collect. "To collect it, they'd have to go before an American judge who would politely tell them to shove it," one commenter summed up.
Privacy and VPNs: resistance's days are numbered
Skepticism dominates the analysis: total anonymity is practically impossible, but tools like VPNs and Tor still work. However, it was pointed out that "if the government is determined, it will eventually catch whoever it's looking for." The key lies in user discipline and in how laws evolve. For now, the social credit system some antiestéticar has not reached the West, but every extraterritorial fine paves the way.
What the discussion makes clear is that the state does not yet have effective tools to sanction foreign forums, but the DSA and other legal frameworks are heading in that direction. The open question: how long will it be before a government decides to block an inconvenient forum and VPNs stop being an option?
Related discussions on the forum
- URGENT: The CONTENTS of Delcy's suitcases revealed · 96 replies
- All hell is breaking loose in Tehran · 80234 replies
- PAGAFANTAS: The IMF confirms that the economy under Sánchez grows through taxes, immigration and public spending. Workers are the ones punished · 16 replies
- Pedro Sánchez is finished, but if he calls elections he's dead. · 100 replies
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (52 replies).
More summaries
-
Out of the frying pan into the fire: the 2012 housing analysis
In 2012 an analyst said buyers held all the cards. Four years of price rises later, the video resurfaces and the thesis falls apart.
-
AI advises 40-year-old with €70,000 and €800 a month
AI therapy: €70,000, €800 a month and living with mum at 40. A 40-year-old man with €70,000 in savings, an €800 monthly salary and a second-hand BMW asks...
-
Ceuta march on the 15th: provocation or flop?
A migrant march is called for Ceuta on the 15th: 70,000 people, a major Civil Guard deployment and a Morocco with its image in Brussels at stake.
-
Spain's government delegate in Ceuta charged over ignored intelligence warnings
Court number 6 in Ceuta has charged the government delegate with dereliction of duty after CNI intelligence warnings about the mass crossing were ignored.
-
Video claims Spain has already agreed to hand over Ceuta and Melilla
An eleven-minute video claims that Ceuta and Melilla have already been secretly agreed with Morocco. With no evidence, the noise keeps growing.
-
Spain's state never resigns: the list of failures keeps growing
The Spanish state fails in a chain: the pandemic, the Valencia floods, the blackout and Ceuta. Public anger grows, but voting patterns don't shift. Why does nobody resign?