Upgrading Ubuntu from 18.04 to 24.04 causes a black screen
Can you upgrade an operating system by six years at once without breaking anything? In this case, no. An Ubuntu user since September 2012—over twelve years of Linux use without a single crash—decided to update their machine because version 18.04 had lost support and was missing menus. They clicked "update," jumping to 20.04. Result: a black desktop, unable to configure anything. They tried again. 22.04. Same issue. They attempted the latest LTS, 24.04, but the situation didn't change: documents, photos, emails, and audio remained accessible, but the graphical environment was barren.
The hardware is not obsolete: AMD Ryzen 7, 16 GB RAM, GTX 1660 Super, and a 500 GB SSD. Plenty of power for any desktop. The problem wasn't the machine; it was the jump.
What happens when you skip six years in Ubuntu updates
According to thread comments, version 20.04 ended support in April, and 18.04 had been out of coverage for two years. Continuing with an unmaintained version and attempting a direct jump is like trying to go from Windows XP to Windows 7 after Microsoft has emptied its servers: the system rejects it. Repositories for intermediate versions are no longer available, turning the update process into a chain of broken dependencies that drags old configurations onto new binaries.
The most common outcome is what the affected user described: the system boots, data is there, but the desktop doesn't render. No wallpaper, no system properties, no menus. Only the browser and email work, as they are independent applications.
The "Oh No… Wrong" error and the command line fix
Seeking solutions, the user found a list of "24 things to do in your new Ubuntu." It included instructions to configure GNOME—Ubuntu's default desktop—via commands. They copied, pasted, and rebooted. Then, a white screen appeared with the message "Oh No… Wrong." The system no longer booted, not even from BIOS.
Diagnosis circulating among those who have seen this error is that the GNOME desktop became unusable. It is not a critical OS failure: files are intact. The most repeated solution involves installing another graphical environment, such as XFCE, via the command line to access the system and then repair or reinstall GNOME.
Reinstalling from scratch: the chosen path
After days of attempts, the user opted for what most voices agreed was the shortest route: download version 24.04.2 on another computer, create a bootable USB drive, and install from scratch, formatting the disk. They had a prior backup of personal data on a USB stick, so nothing was lost.
The most persistent recommendation from those who have faced similar situations is to separate the [/I]/home[/I] partition from the system partition. This way, when the system breaks, it can be reinstalled without touching personal files. Another common practice is using filesystems with snapshots—BTRFS or ZFS—which allow rolling back in time without relying on manual backups.
Is Linux unstable, or is it user error?
The topic turned into a classic debate. On one side, those arguing these disasters prove Linux isn't for everyone and that Windows remains more user-friendly. On the other, those reminding us that the user had used Ubuntu for twelve years without serious issues, and that the failure came not from Linux itself but from skipping six years of versions without passing through intermediates.
Some point out that massive updates cause problems in any system, including Windows, and that gradual updating is sensible. Others defend that rolling release distributions—those updated continuously—are actually more stable long-term because they never accumulate such large version jumps. The discussion, as almost always when Linux and Windows collide, ended up hotter than the technical problem itself.
In the end, the user reinstalled, updated packages, configured the browser, and adjusted fonts and colors. Everything works. The lesson, if anyone needs it: don't make six-year jumps, neither in operating systems nor in mortgages.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (116 replies).
A forum thread debates grey ash porcelain tiles, citing dirty grout lines and uniformity, questioning why durable materials are replaced after 20 years.