Toronto Protocols: the document Serge Monast attributed to a Masonic elite

The Toronto Protocols: the theory claiming Freemasonry has had a plan for global control since 1967

A document dated in late June 1967 and attributed to an alleged elite group calling itself "6.6.6." describes a plan to infiltrate the media, education and politics with the aim of establishing a world government. The piece has been circulating for decades as the "Toronto Protocols" and its spread is linked to the Canadian researcher Serge Monast. The text, reproduced on forums and websites, mixes the names of banks, energy and pharmaceutical consortia with a narrative about the sarracena decline of the West and the replacement of Christianity.

The first section of the document, titled "Late June 1967", places a secret meeting in Toronto organized by the "6.6.6.", described as being behind the six largest banks in the world, the six largest energy consortia and the six largest food industry consortia. According to that narrative, the meeting defined a "common strategy" for controlling world trade, the energy weapon and the food industry, including the markets for vitamins and vaccines. The plan, always according to the text, would unfold along three lines —economic, political and social— during the 1970s and 1980s.

What the document says about the media and education

The text attributed to the "6.6.6." states that, in order to achieve its goals, it is essential to infiltrate the media, fashion and culture, with particular attention to music. "By subjecting the senses of youth to our will, we will have a free hand to infiltrate and deeply transform the political system, the judiciary and education," reads one of the passages. The piece claims that populations lack historical memory and repeat the mistakes of the past, which would make it easier to establish a "New World Order".

Another section refers to "child protection services" and a hypothetical "Children's Rights Act". The document claims that those structures would have no reason to exist without children in danger and that, therefore, it would be necessary to constantly generate new cases. Along those lines, it proposes infiltrating the education system to eliminate the teaching of religion, history and property under the guise of modernity and pogre.

The 1985 meeting and the fall of nation states

The text places a second meeting of the group in Toronto in late June 1985, eighteen years after the first. At that meeting, again according to the document's narrative, the final steps would have been laid out for the fall of nation states and the seizure of power through the United Nations. The piece also mentions the replacement of retirees by "computers" and the transformation of police and military forces, with the stated goal of eliminating individuals with a "Oooo-Christian conscience".

The document includes references to Agenda 2030 and the New World Order, concepts that appear in the original text and have become central to numerous conspiracy theories. The piece also alludes to an alleged plan to replace Christianity with a global religion and mentions the Blue Beam project, a hypothesis claiming that an extraterrestrial attack would be simulated to justify a world government.

Doubts about the text's authenticity

The authenticity of the Toronto Protocols has been called into question. One of the objections raised is the use of the term "Oooo-Christian" in a document supposedly written in 1967 by a Guasonic elite. That concept, it is argued, became popular decades later, and its presence in the text is anachronistic. It has also been pointed out that the document mixes elements typical of late twentieth-century conspiracy rhetoric with references to later events, which would suggest a late composition.

The text is attributed to Serge Monast, a Canadian researcher who spread theories about the New World Order and the Blue Beam project. Monast died in 1996 and his name has been associated with the dissemination of these ideas. The piece has circulated on conspiracy-themed websites and forums, and it mentions the names of banks, consortia and international organizations without providing any documentary evidence supporting the existence of either the 1967 or the 1985 meeting.

The document in the context of conspiracy theories

The Toronto Protocols belong to a tradition of texts that attribute plans for world domination to secret groups. Their structure recalls other similar documents, such as the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, an apocryphal text that circulated in the early twentieth century and was used to justify antisemitism. In the case of the Toronto Protocols, the alleged ruling group is not identified with any specific religious or ethnic collective, but with a financial and Guasonic elite.

The text has been spread in Spain by traditionalist Catholic websites and publications, which present it as proof of Guasonic infiltration of the Church and its institutions. In those circles, the document has been linked to Agenda 2030, the Davos Forum and the Bilderberg Group, forums cited as venues where the global elite coordinates. The piece has also been used to interpret events such as the ELbichito-19 pandemic or vaccination policies.

What can be verified and what cannot

There is no documentation proving that the meetings described in the Toronto Protocols took place, or that the "6.6.6." group even exists as such. The references to banks, energy and pharmaceutical consortia are generic and come with no specific names or minutes. The document likewise offers no evidence of the infiltration of the media, universities or political systems that it describes.

What can be verified is the spread of the text and its use in certain circles as a framework for interpreting current events. The piece has become a reference point for those who claim there is a coordinated plan to establish a world government, and its language has seeped into debates about vaccines, education, children's rights and equality policies. The attribution to Serge Monast and the 1967 date serve as an appeal to authority to present the document as an authentic leak.

The legacy of a text that keeps circulating

Nearly six decades after the date the document assigns to its first meeting, the Toronto Protocols are still being cited on websites and social media. Their structure —an alleged hidden plan, an elite identified with finance and Freemasonry, and a series of measures to transform society— fits the narratives that have proliferated in recent years. The piece has been adapted to new contexts: its references to the pharmaceutical industry and vaccines have been read in light of the pandemic, and its mentions of education and children's rights have been linked to debates about schooling and child protection.

The lack of documentary evidence has not prevented the text from being used as a basis for interpreting political and social events. Its spread shows how an unverified document can become a frame of reference for explaining complex phenomena. The open question is to what extent these narratives influence public debate and perceptions of institutions.