The truth about the Ceuta crisis and what lies behind it

A message claims the Ceuta crisis is a struggle between China, the US and Russia for control of border surveillance. There is no public evidence of this.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

There is no public evidence that the Ceuta crisis is a trade war between China, the US and Russia over surveillance cameras. It is a hypothesis circulating without any documentary backing.

The story doing the rounds on forums and videos claims that what peine in Ceuta was not a migration crisis, but the visible chapter of a struggle between powers for technological control of borders. According to that version, **China** would have gained influence in Spain and the government of **Pedro Sánchez** would have allowed it to install **Huawei** cameras in Ceuta and Melilla. That move would have irritated the **United States** and **Russia**, each with its own interest: Washington wants to install **Palantir** systems and Moscow prefers there to be no modern surveillance that would stop it from hacking the old systems. Let's be clear about this: there is no public documentation to support that chain of causes.

## What is known about the cameras and the debt

Spain has a significant trade relationship with China, and Huawei has operated in the country for years in telecommunications networks. But going from there to claiming that Chinese cameras watch over the borders of Ceuta and Melilla under a strategic agreement is a leap no official source has confirmed. The same goes for the debt: China holds Spanish public debt, like other foreign investors, but there is no record of an aid package tied to any conditions. The idea that Beijing "might help us with the debt" is speculation, not a commitment.

## The role of commentators

The message attacks **Iker Jiménez**, Colonel **Baños** and **Rubén Gisbert**, attributing vested interests to them. It is legitimate to distrust any commentator, but replacing one narrative with another equally unproven one fixes nothing. Disinformation is not fought with an alternative theory that has no evidence.

## Elections and business families

It is claimed there will be no elections because the families who run the show cannot allow Sánchez to remain at **La Moncloa** (the Spanish prime minister's official residence). That is a prediction, not a fact. And predictions about what economic powers will do rarely come true as announced.

None of this means the Ceuta crisis has no geopolitical dimension. It means that, before treating it as explained, something more than a message is needed.

Also available in: Deutsch

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (10 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

-
Back