THE SO-CALLED GLOBAL ANTI-DICTATORSHIP

The idea of a "global anti-dictatorship" is questioned by those who argue that it has generated more violence and division than the dictatorships it supposedly combats.

The supposed global struggle against dictatorship conceals, for some, a history of violence and division. It is argued that, far from bringing liberation, this narrative has served to justify actions that have provoked terrorism, drug cartels, and poverty. The criticism points to an ideology that, under the guise of combating oppressive regimes, has fostered division and misunderstanding, confusing economic policies like Keynesianism with communism or statism.

## The Confused Genealogy of Ideologies

The confusion between **Keynesianism**, which flourished in the West for decades, and what is labeled as "dictatorship" or "communism" is a key point. This misrepresentation, according to this view, is fueled by a neoliberal ideology seeking mental control—a betrayal of fundamental principles. A vision is presented where the "anti-dictatorship" opposes reason, promoting a disorder that, instead of solving problems, exacerbates them, such as suggested by the neglect of the food industry or the acceleration of automation with robots and **AI**.

## A Fight Against Reason?

It is argued that the anti-dictatorial narrative, by rejecting reasonableness, can lead to a return to stricter forms of control. The criticism is aimed at a supposed "liar" who exploits situations, pointing fingers at entities such as **Judaism** and the **State of Israel**. They are accused of having facilitated the rise of dictatorships for convenience, dismissing the idea of a genuine struggle against tyranny and calling it "a million lies."