The So-Called Global Anti-Dictatorship Movement Under Scrutiny

The idea of a "global anti-dictatorship" is questioned by those who argue it has generated more violence and division than the dictatorships it claims to fight.

For some, the supposed global struggle against dictatorship conceals a history of violence and division. It is argued that, far from liberating, this narrative has served to justify actions that have produced terrorism, drug cartels and poverty. The criticism points to an ideology that, under the guise of fighting oppressive regimes, has fostered division and misunderstanding, confusing economic policies such as Keynesianism with communism or statism.

## The confusing genealogy of ideologies

The confusion between **Keynesianism**, which thrived in the West for decades, and what is labelled "dictatorship" or "communism" is a key point. According to this view, this distortion is fed by a neoliberal ideology that seeks mind control, a betrayal of fundamental principles. It presents a vision in which the "anti-dictatorship" stance opposes reason, promoting a disorder that aggravates problems rather than solving them, as suggested by the neglect of the food industry or the acceleration of automation with robots and **AI**.

## A struggle against reason?

It is argued that the anti-dictatorship narrative, by rejecting reasonableness, can lead to a return to more severe forms of control. The criticism is aimed at an alleged "liar" who takes advantage of situations, pointing to entities such as **Judaism** and the **State of Israel**. These are accused of having facilitated the rise of dictatorships out of convenience, disproving the idea of a genuine struggle against tyranny and calling it "a million lies".