The Red-Rich: The Archetype Accused of Hypocrisy

High income, leftist rhetoric, and private jets: the "red-rich" archetype divides Spanish political debate and draws heavy criticism for double standards.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

The Red-Rich: The Archetype Accused of Hypocrisy
The Red-Rich: Private luxury with a public leftist narrative

The red-rich exist, and their own contradiction is the best definition. The archetype—high income, leftist discourse, social causes displayed on display, and physical distance from almost everything they claim to defend—has become prime material for Spanish political ridicule. The most repeated criticism is a chain of inconsistencies: proclaiming that travel cures fascism, yet only setting foot in European countries or luxury resorts when outside the continent. Explaining to a worker why they shouldn't take an old car while parking a high-end SUV. And the highest level: the private jet, justified by the argument that it “has no exhaust pipe” and therefore pollutes less.

What exactly is a red-rich and why is it used as an accusation

There is no academic definition. There is a list of gestures circulating in the thread. The professed love for multiculturalism coexisting with living as far away from that reality as possible. The menu veganism undone by a platter of shrimp. The summer of refuge—the youngest Sahrawi, the girl who arrived from Chernobyl decades ago—as a solidarity display, with no contact with that world for the rest of the year. The criticism also includes double standards in personal life, where the archetype demands from others what it does not apply to itself.

The names that keep appearing when applying the term

The term is affixed to known figures and positions: a television presenter turned into an emblem of the profile, socialist ministers and former presidents whose assets are scrutinized, and a former executive remembered for his fondness for cheap gasoline or being “Spain's most frugal man.” Regarding the current government, it is said for now that there is no material evidence. All of this circulates as suspicion and jest, not verified fact.

The counterattack: “At least they don’t want to return to the 19th century”

The defense comes from another flank. Nobody is perfect, they say, but this profile does not propose dismantling healthcare or pensions to return to factories with working children. And there is a more uncomfortable twist for the left-wing voter without assets: the criticism extends to those who vote against their own interests and applaud what impoverishes them.

With these pieces, the term has life. If the red-rich disappear from political language, it will be more likely because another, worse archetype has replaced them than because the inconsistencies have been corrected.

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (15 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

Back