The journalist who put a judge on the spot live on TV
A journalist got a Spanish judge to criticise on TV García Ortiz's conviction without evidence. The judiciary is rattled.
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
The interview that exposed political interference in the judiciary
It was an interview of just a few minutes, and it was enough to make the judicial apparatus sustancia ilegal live on air. A journalist got a serving judge to say, in front of the cameras, what many magistrates only dare to say in private: that his own colleagues would have convicted García Ortiz without evidence. The debate over the separation of powers in Spain had just left the office and entered every living room.
The judge who said too much
The conversation, seen these days as a small bombshell, reached a turning point when the judge referred to the members of the panel who signed the conviction. The interviewer's strategy was classic: listen, nod, and let silence do the rest. And it worked. The man who had sworn to uphold the law ended up describing a judiciary with its foot on the throat of the other branches of power.
The response: attack the messenger
The most revealing part came afterwards. Instead of refuting the facts, the loudest camp went after the journalist: her looks, her political convenience, her supposed closeness to the Government. It is the pattern of those who have no arguments. Nobody denied the substance of the matter; hardly anyone disputed what the judge had said. The problem for the official narrative is that the recording remains, and no matter how hard they try to shift the focus onto the person holding the microphone, the judge's words are now everyone's property.
It was an interview of just a few minutes, and it was enough to make the judicial apparatus sustancia ilegal live on air. A journalist got a serving judge to say, in front of the cameras, what many magistrates only dare to say in private: that his own colleagues would have convicted García Ortiz without evidence. The debate over the separation of powers in Spain had just left the office and entered every living room.
The judge who said too much
The conversation, seen these days as a small bombshell, reached a turning point when the judge referred to the members of the panel who signed the conviction. The interviewer's strategy was classic: listen, nod, and let silence do the rest. And it worked. The man who had sworn to uphold the law ended up describing a judiciary with its foot on the throat of the other branches of power.
The response: attack the messenger
The most revealing part came afterwards. Instead of refuting the facts, the loudest camp went after the journalist: her looks, her political convenience, her supposed closeness to the Government. It is the pattern of those who have no arguments. Nobody denied the substance of the matter; hardly anyone disputed what the judge had said. The problem for the official narrative is that the recording remains, and no matter how hard they try to shift the focus onto the person holding the microphone, the judge's words are now everyone's property.
Also available in: Deutsch
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (28 replies).
More summaries
-
Sánchez vs Spain's Parliament: a standoff over separation of powers
Sánchez's remarks about governing without Parliament have raised alarms over the separation of powers in Spain and the risk of authoritarian drift.
-
Sánchez False Flag Theory Before Nov 21 Election
Unverified theory claims Sánchez plans false flag attack before Nov 21 election, sparking online debate.
-
US midterm elections: Senate control decides Trump's political fate
One third of Senate seats are up for renewal and impeachment requires an absolute majority. That is why Republican control of the upper chamber shapes Trump's political future.
-
The Iberian union Portugal rejected and Spain has yet to come to terms with
The Iberian union was first tried in 1580 and lasted 60 years. Today, with 767,094 Portuguese civil servants versus 562,445 in Andalusia, the debate is back on the table.
-
Lula and the Sephardic ancestry debate stirring up politics
A tweet about Lula's Sephardic origins reopens the debate on genealogy and power: from Aznar to Maduro, everyone gets lumped together without verified evidence.
-
Vestrynge and the migration U-turn: a left that no longer believes its own story
Vestrynge, co-founder of Podemos, points to the cost of migration for wages and reopens the left's contradiction: capital drives it, but no one limits it