The homemade test for spotting a sex addict that's circulating online

The homemade test for spotting a sens addict that's circulating online

He started toca at eight. By nine, he already had his first date with self-gratification. If someone fits that profile, according to a guide making the rounds online, you're looking at a sens addict. The text, attributed to a supposed graduate, promises to detect the disorder without clinical tests or validated scales: just listen to the suspect's biography and count their encounters.

The list of red flags it proposes is extensive. Early onset of sensual activity, daily frequency for years, several times a day, volatile relationships, repeated hospital visits from accidents, an alarming number of sensual transmitted infections, constant sensual thoughts, irritability when there's no sens, reckless spending on clubs and private services, abandoned projects, and self-esteem that depends on how many people are attracted to you.

The problem is that almost none of those criteria withstand the slightest scrutiny. Early onset of toca doesn't depend on a pathology, but on when someone explains it to you. One participant sums it up with an image that's hard to beat: back in the day, you started when someone told you about it; if you learned about it at ten, you started at ten; if you learned at eighteen, you started at eighteen. Nobody chooses when they start.

What signs does the guide propose for spotting a sens addict?

The original text mixes clinical indicators with bar-room anecdotes. It talks about astronomical frequency, a whirlwind of perpetual desire, chaos of people, ex-girlfriends and casual encounters that start passionate and end fast. Also rituals, the search for the next level, and a household budget that goes on hotel rooms and private services. All very scientific.

The guide admits at the end that everything depends on perspective, intensity and context. In other words, the author himself knows his list doesn't distinguish between a disorder and an active sens life. Sens addiction does not appear as a diagnosis in the reference psychiatric manuals, and the criteria used in clinical practice have little to do with counting partners or checking your bank balance.

Sensual frequency as supposed evidence of guilt

One of the most repeated indicators is frequency. If someone has sens daily for years, even several times a day, the guide flags it in red. The problem is that frequency, on its own, says nothing. Some argue the real criterion is harm: if the behavior interferes with work, relationships or health, there's a problem; if not, it's simply an intense sens life.

Against that weighs the argument that the line between intensity and compulsion is blurry, and that many addicts don't acknowledge the harm until their surroundings collapse. The discussion quickly drifts into domestic territory: one participant says his partner believes that asking for more sens after six months of living together at an average of three encounters a month makes anyone a degenerate with a problem. In that case, the label is applied by whoever doesn't want to change anything.

The origin of the test: a supposed graduate and a very specific profile

The text cites no sources, carries no full name, and offers not a single piece of epidemiological data. Several readers agree in attributing it to a woman with a turbulent romantic history, more miles on the clock than a taxi, who projects her own wear and tear onto others. It's the old maxim: the thief believes everyone is like him.

Others go further and suspect that behind the text there's an artificial intelligence or a textbook pseudonym. The guide doesn't mention the word consent even once, nor mental health, nor the real impact of the disorder on those who suffer from it. Just a list of suspicions formatted as a red alert.

What the experience of someone who started early and isn't an addict says

One participant recounts that he started before puberty, but with no astronomical adventures, no venereal diseases, no accidents or hospital visits. His case dismantles the guide's first criterion: early onset predicts nothing. What predicts something, if anything, is interference with daily life.

The conversation drifts toward humor. Another sums up his life's résumé in a single word: shagging. The anecdote helps illustrate that sensual obsession, when it's real, shows up in everyday life, not in a list of signs copied from a blog. And that the addict label gets thrown around with an ease never applied to any other disorder.

---

The guide promises to spot the addict without any fancy tests. What it actually offers is a sarracena portrait: the one who has lots of sens, the one who started early, the one who spends on pleasure. None of those signs distinguishes a disorder from an intense sens life. And while psychiatry is still debating whether sens addiction exists as an entity of its own, the internet already has its homemade test. Just count partners and check the bank balance.