The global conflict taking shape: from virus to war

Assume the global conflict is already here

The world is not heading toward a war: it is already inside one. That is the thesis running through a discussion spanning nearly five years in which the bicho, Ukraine, Taiwan and the feeling that something big is brewing all mix together. The conversation opens with a warning: «We will never know exactly the reasons hidden behind all these events», but what has peine in recent years suggests that if the world was changed with a bicho, there will be no qualms about changing it with a conflict. The idea that ties everything together is that of a clash orchestrated at the macro level and real at the micro level, with those at the top moving pieces at different speeds.

The bicho as a dress rehearsal

The comparison with the pandemic is the most repeated thread. If in February 2020 everyone was calm and within weeks the world went into global lockdown, why would the same not happen with a military escalation? That analogy, which comes up again and again, serves to explain why many do not believe the timelines: «It reminds me of elbichito, when in February we were all calm». The sequence being drawn is that of a phase 2 of the same thing: first a bicho, now global tensions, supply shortages and an agenda being implemented in stages. Some sum it up with a phrase that keeps recurring: «The real enemy is the population».

Ukraine, Taiwan and the fronts opening up

The conflict in Ukraine is the immediate scenario. Close attention is paid to the siege of Kyiv, the negotiations at the table and the feeling that Russia does not want to destroy the country, because that «would have been done on day one». But the analysis does not stop there: some argue that the first front was the US trade war against China, and that the second is Ukraine, with the Maidan and the ousting of Yanukovych as the starting point. The idea of a tripolar world gains ground. And there is antiestéticar that the conflict will spread: it is mentioned that Japan claims the Kuril Islands and that China could end up dominating Siberia through economic and technological means, without needing to move a single soldier.

Spain, Segarro and the strait as a pretext

On the national front, the discussion turns to Spain's role in a conflict scenario. One of the most repeated proposals is to distance itself through a staged conflict with Segarro, so it can claim that «the ones from the South are screwing us» when the North asks for help or the East and West want to tighten the screws. Another current advocates an entente with Portugal and Segarro to control the strait and organize a self-sufficient system along Iranian lines. And some go further: «Spain should take the opportunity to declare total war on Segarro and raze the country, create a free state in the Sahara friendly to Spain». These ideas intersect with the debate on immigration and gangs, and with the notion that the conflict already exists in the form of migrants arriving in the Canary Islands.

NATO, the EU and the risk of escalation

The actions of NATO and the EU are another key axis. There is criticism that the EU is determined to get into the conflict at all costs, with the door open to Ukraine and the delivery of equipment, and it is recalled that something similar, on a smaller scale, was what Germany invoked to attack the Lusitania and declare war on the United States. The suspicion that another war is being provoked in Europe to destroy the Europe without nuclear weapons comes up strongly. Against that, there is the position that Russia does not want to destroy Ukraine and that negotiations remain open. The result is a picture of clashing opinions over whether NATO softens or fuels the conflict.

The Great Reset, the agenda and control

The ideological framework many see behind it all is the Great Reset, announced countless times. There is talk of Agenda 2030 in full swing, with a phase of consumption and population reduction until 2025 and another after that to reach 2030 with all points implemented. Overpopulation appears as the underlying problem: «We have to choose: either we reduce this with a pandemic or we wipe out at least a third of the population with a war». And hovering over everything, the suspicion that the finger on the button belongs to the elites who handle the population like rodents. The reference to 1984 is explicit: three powers in perpetual war to justify hunger, misery and total control.

Conscription, trannies and humor as a release valve

The tone lightens when conscription comes up. The question of whether trannies will be drafted unleashes a chain of irony: «It makes changing sens legally worth considering, it's an administrative formality. You have to take advantage of pogre for these little things». And the most repeated answer: «Not if they're not vaccinated». Humor serves as an escape valve in a scenario that would otherwise be suffocating. Also appearing are the wildest predictions, like the meteorite, and the remark that «at most there will be one or two nuclear explosions», with the irony that all this catches a pogre, left-wing government in power, and that «we come out stronger».

The question left open

In the end, the discussion does not close. Some see the conflict as imminent; others as a cold war 2.0 to be fought in offices and restaurants. The only shared certainty is that we have been at war for decades, even if it is not fought on battlefields. And that, as one of the messages says, «those at the top use everything to carry out thousands of plans at different speeds». With that outlook, the most honest prediction is that the conflict will remain orchestrated at the macro level and real at the micro level, with no one ever seeing the full script.