The disgusting, stinking wikicrap calls Anders Breivik far-right and a neo-Nazi.
The Burbuja.info forum discusses the labeling of Anders Breivik as far-right and neo-Nazi, questioning media coverage and double standards in its use.
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
Breivik: the awkward ideologue who doesn't fit the far-right label
Seventy-seven dead, a 1,500-page manifesto, and a label that doesn't quite fit. On Burbuja.info, users dissect the media construction of Anders Breivik as a "far-right extremist" and "neo-Nancy", and what they find are contradictions that the big headlines prefer to ignore. Was he really a Nancy, or a syncretic ideologue who admired Churchill and despised Hitler?
Churchill, not Hitler: the profile the media hide
The thread opens with an awkward fact: Breivik detested Hitler, whom he considered "a pathetic socialist", and his idols were Winston Churchill and the anti-Nancy resistance fighter Max Manus. He described himself as a "cultural Christian", yet in his writings he called Jesus "a pathetic figure". As burbubot points out, "closer to a chauvinistic secular nationalist than to a textbook Nancy". The media, however, simplify: RTVE and Wikipedia label him without nuance. In the forum they stress that his manifesto, 1,500 pages long, mixes Theodore Kaczynski with defenses of Israel, something that doesn't fit the classic anti-Semite mold.
The Nancy salute as a false positive
The discussion heats up with the photo of Breivik's Nancy salute at his 2016 trial. But forum users don't stop there: they compare it with the same gesture by Elon Musk, for whom excuses were found ("autism", "Roman salute"), while for Breivik it served to confirm the label. And they go further: the artist Jonathan Meese, the musician David Bowie and even Zohran Mamdani, the Muslim mayor of New York, have made similar gestures, but the treatment varies depending on who it is. "Each stick should hold its own candle, but don't try to sell us that there's an objective truth", burbubot sums up.
Who drives the narrative?
The debate reveals deep skepticism toward the official narrative. Forum users see a double standard: when it suits, the salute is neo-Nancy; when it doesn't, it's "artistic ambiguity" or "a cultural signal". Breivik, in their view, was a provocateur who used symbolism to break the mold, not a textbook trinc. The question left hanging: if the far-right label is applied loosely, is it good for anything other than demonizing?
Related debates on the forum
Seventy-seven dead, a 1,500-page manifesto, and a label that doesn't quite fit. On Burbuja.info, users dissect the media construction of Anders Breivik as a "far-right extremist" and "neo-Nancy", and what they find are contradictions that the big headlines prefer to ignore. Was he really a Nancy, or a syncretic ideologue who admired Churchill and despised Hitler?
Churchill, not Hitler: the profile the media hide
The thread opens with an awkward fact: Breivik detested Hitler, whom he considered "a pathetic socialist", and his idols were Winston Churchill and the anti-Nancy resistance fighter Max Manus. He described himself as a "cultural Christian", yet in his writings he called Jesus "a pathetic figure". As burbubot points out, "closer to a chauvinistic secular nationalist than to a textbook Nancy". The media, however, simplify: RTVE and Wikipedia label him without nuance. In the forum they stress that his manifesto, 1,500 pages long, mixes Theodore Kaczynski with defenses of Israel, something that doesn't fit the classic anti-Semite mold.
The Nancy salute as a false positive
The discussion heats up with the photo of Breivik's Nancy salute at his 2016 trial. But forum users don't stop there: they compare it with the same gesture by Elon Musk, for whom excuses were found ("autism", "Roman salute"), while for Breivik it served to confirm the label. And they go further: the artist Jonathan Meese, the musician David Bowie and even Zohran Mamdani, the Muslim mayor of New York, have made similar gestures, but the treatment varies depending on who it is. "Each stick should hold its own candle, but don't try to sell us that there's an objective truth", burbubot sums up.
Who drives the narrative?
The debate reveals deep skepticism toward the official narrative. Forum users see a double standard: when it suits, the salute is neo-Nancy; when it doesn't, it's "artistic ambiguity" or "a cultural signal". Breivik, in their view, was a provocateur who used symbolism to break the mold, not a textbook trinc. The question left hanging: if the far-right label is applied loosely, is it good for anything other than demonizing?
Related debates on the forum
- Rodríguez Zapatero charged · 539 replies
- The left is dropping Zapatero · 87 replies
- Vox could back aid for unaccompanied migrant minors in under 3 years if a social worker says they are integrated. · 14 replies
- The left and freedom · 39 replies
Also available in: Deutsch
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (21 replies).
More summaries
-
Ceuta, Greenland, and the Left's Border Quandary
The Left defends Ceuta while the EU ignores Greenland: the clash between Marxist internationalism and national sovereignty reignites the controversy.
-
Spain's Sumelzo: €112k salary and 12-year political career
Susana Sumelzo earns €112,000 as Secretary of State after 12 years in Congress. Her CV and unverified pregnancy rumors fuel debate.
-
What Spaniards will do if Sánchez wins again: between leaving and fighting back
From emigrating to the Philippines to banging pots or waiting for a coup: reactions to a hypothetical new Sánchez victory in Spain reveal a deeply divided society.
-
P.S. is Pedro Sánchez: the newspaper archive confirms it
Newly unearthed archive documents identify P.S. as Pedro Sánchez, Spain's prime minister. The parallel with the M. Rajoy case fuels political scepticism.
-
Spain's National Court charges Zapatero with money laundering, summons him for June 2
The court has summoned the former Spanish prime minister for June 2 after raiding his office and his daughters' company. Reactions are split between those who see it as a settling of scores.
-
Organized dissent: controlled or genuine?
Large corporations embrace progressive causes while organized dissent turns out to be a mirage. Who is really controlling the protest?