The cheapest protein for muscle building: 1.43 cents per gram

The per-gram calculation puts eggs at 1.16 cents and powder at 1.43. Store brands don't always win when compared with real food.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

The cheapest protein for muscle building: 1.43 cents per gram
Cheap protein: a gram costs 1.43 cents, eggs come in at 1.16

A five-kilo bag for 41 euros, plus 13 for shipping. That was the starting point that kicked off the search for the cheapest muscle-building protein, and the result of the hunt turns out to be a lesson in supermarket arithmetic more than in supplementation. Because when everything is put into cents per gram of actual protein, store-brand powder stops looking so unbeatable.

The product that started the conversation was an 80% protein powder at a clearance price, with the catch being shipping costs and doubts about where it came from. The alternative that won the comparison was another online retailer's brand, with frequent 20-25% coupons and an extra 5% off the first purchase, which brought the five-kilo bag down to **45 euros**. That's where things got interesting.

What a gram of protein really costs

The breakdown that settled the discussion is pure cost-per-unit-of-nutrient math. Five kilos of protein powder at 55 euros, with 82% purity, works out at **1.43 cents per gram**. A litre of egg white at 2.05 euros comes to 2.46 cents. Turkey slices at 7 euros a kilo land between 3.5 and 3.89 cents. And whole eggs, at 1.05 euros a dozen, stay at **1.16 cents**.

The paradox is plain to see: the cheapest food per gram of protein isn't the tub with the scoop, it's the egg. Chickens—sorry, chickpeas—tell a similar story: a kilo at 1.25 euros yields 190 grams of protein, though nobody takes a tupperware of legumes to the gym locker room.

The problem with powdered milk and carbs

The suggestion of replacing the shake with skimmed milk powder took a double hit: it works out expensive and drags along a load of carbohydrates many people don't want. Lactose, moreover, is a real digestive problem for part of the population. The argument that isolated protein is absorbed better than protein mixed with sugars didn't convince everyone, but the convenience argument did.

There's the crux: protein powder doesn't win on price, it wins on logistics. Five kilos of powder take up less space than five kilos of eggs and don't expire as quickly.

The war over the anabolic window

The other front was physiological. Against the orthodoxy of the shake immediately after training, arguments piled up that absorption estimulante ilegal isn't that critical for rebuilding tissue, that excess protein does more harm than good, and that most of the recommendations about insulin spikes and the anabolic window are aimed at those who compete with chemical help. For the natural lifter, the limiting factor is usually something else: training and resting.

Which brand to choose when price isn't everything

Perceived quality matters. Some defend paying more for brands with favourable independent testing and European manufacturing, as opposed to products of opaque origin. Others point out that the prices of established brands have risen over the years, pushing people to hunt for coupons or migrate to other websites.

The question left hanging is the usual one: how much of that premium is quality and how much is marketing?

Also available in: Deutsch

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (74 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

-
Back