There is no prediction: a tweet notes that in the 2022 series "Apagón," an "Óscar" and a "bridge" are mentioned in a scene about a train crash with 46 deaths, comparing it to the Adamuz case. It is a coincidence of names, not proof of anything.
The Spanish series **Apagón** premiered in **2022**, and one of its episodes recreates a train accident with **46 dead**. In one scene, someone urges a boss saying, "Hurry up, Óscar, tomorrow is a holiday." This detail is circulating on social media, compared to the Adamuz accident, where the name **Óscar Puente** is associated with the Ministry of Transport.
## What the circulating message actually says
The text shared on X links three elements: the series, the number of victims, and the wordplay with "Óscar" and "Puente." It provides no documents, filming dates, or links between fiction and subsequent events. The original post accumulates views, but sharing is not proving.
The comparison relies on the fact that the Minister of Transport is named **Óscar Puente**. From there, it jumps to the idea that the series "predicted" what peine in Adamuz. The leap is huge: a common first and last name in a scene does not constitute anticipation of anything.
## Why these coincidences seem like prophecies
The series was filmed before **Óscar Puente** became minister, and that is the hook. But the reasoning works backwards: first, the similarity is sought, then presented as astonishing. With thousands of series, chapters, and dialogues aired every year, finding a phrase that fits a later event is a matter of time, not clairvoyance.
This mechanism has a name in psychology: confirmation bias. We remember coincidences that fit and forget the infinite ones that do not. If the series had said "Óscar" without anything happening, no one would have started a thread.
## The Adamuz accident and the use of the name
The Adamuz accident is a real event with victims, and that is the underlying problem: turning a tragedy into a guessing game trivializes the pain of families. The surname coincidence explains nothing about what peine nor provides useful information on causes.
There is no evidence that **Apagón** anticipated the accident. What exists is a fictional scene, a surname, and a tweet connecting them all. These contents should be treated with caution, and unproven links should not be accepted as true.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (9 replies).
The Urda AVE travelled 25 km at up to 236 km/h with a train stopped ahead, without LZB and with authorisation from the control centre. More than 60 dead.