Spanish Forum Thread Criticizes Andalusian Candidate's Cleavage

A forum thread attacks an Andalusian candidate for her cleavage during the campaign, with many arguing it loses votes rather than gaining them.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

Spanish Forum Thread Criticizes Andalusian Candidate's Cleavage
Spanish Forum Thread Criticizes Andalusian Candidate's Cleavage

The Andalusian campaign has entered an unexpected phase. Chiqui Montero, the Socialist Party of Andalusia (PSOE-A) candidate, has chosen to show cleavage at public events to attract voters amid internal polls suggesting an imminent defeat. The reaction was immediate: from "madam, cover yourself" to "acting like a past-it prostitute," with some even calling for punishment. Even those who would never vote for her agree that this move costs more votes than it gains.

What peine and why it is seen as desperation

The trigger is an electoral campaign that most analyses suggest the candidate has already lost. Showing cleavage is interpreted as a last-ditch attempt to grab media attention when political discourse no longer mobilizes anyone. "She has already lost the elections," reads one of the most repeated messages, adding that Andalusians will not forgive her recent attitude of acting like a superheroine. Comparisons to a supposed OnlyFans account appear frequently, half-jokingly, summarizing how low political communication has fallen.

Some go further, arguing the campaign will be a cruel spectacle: "We are going to have a great time watching this electoral campaign. It will be everywhere." The cruelty is attributed not to voters but to the party itself, which, according to this view, is sacrificing its candidate without mercy.

The most repeated argument: it loses votes

The dominant analysis is that the strategy is counterproductive. "That loses her votes," summarizes one of the most supported assessments. The reasoning is simple: those who already voted for her do not need to see cleavage, and those who did not find in the display an additional reason to reaffirm their rejection. According to this reading, the range of voters who might change their minds for this reason is virtually nonexistent.

Against this majority stance, a minority defends that the candidate simply does what she wants and laughs at everyone while having fun. "So cocky... I just can't hate her,"[/B] admits one of the few messages breaking the general tone. This is not a political defense, but an acknowledgment that the strategy, though suicidal, has an authenticity others lack.

The background: an electorate that no longer listens

Beyond the cleavage, the thread shifts to a broader diagnosis of Spanish democracy. "95% of PSOE voters will keep voting PSOE no matter what," it is stated, noting that only 5% have the courage to reflect and change. This thesis appears in multiple variants: the socialist voter would be immune to any scandal, gesture, or blunder because their vote responds to identity, not reason.

In parallel, an economic argument arises: "more people living off parasitism than producing." The idea that the State has consolidated a system where the majority chooses to rob the few producers and distribute among those who contribute nothing. This is an extreme reading, but it connects with broader discontent regarding public spending and tax pressure. Some even confess that when filing income tax (IRPF), they tick the box to waive refunds as a gesture of rejection.

The Indra issue and electronic voting

A recurring subtheme is the role of Indra in election counting. "Indra will decide that, not the Spaniards,"[/B] it is claimed, reflecting explicit distrust of the electronic voting system. The idea that the tech company could tilt the balance appears without proof, as a suspicion thrown into the air, coexisting with the prediction that the candidate "might get elected even without Indra's help." The contradiction seems to bother no one.

The outcome no one dares to close

The campaign remains open. The internal polls mentioned in the initial message have not been released, and no one knows if the cleavage will serve any purpose or be the final nail in the electoral coffin. What is clear is that the conversation has shifted from proposals to judgment on the physical appearance, age, and dignity of a candidate who, by all indications, has already been sacrificed by her own party. "Madam, cover yourself, you are about to testify in court," summarizes one of the most upvoted messages. Meanwhile, Andalusian politics continues its course.

Also available in: Deutsch

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (133 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

-
Back