Spanish Actress Mouliaá Proposed as Conspiratorial Forum Muse

From Errejón to NATO: Mouliaá as the Forum's Muse

Elisa Mouliaá has found a new audience. Not in fiction or on set, but in the digital ecosystem where rumors are cooked up that, according to some messages, she recites by heart. The proposal to name her muse and ideological guide of a current affairs forum stems from a video in which the actress chains together, according to those commenting, the commonplaces of Spanish conspiracism: 9/11 as an excuse, climate change as business, NATO behind the floods. All in less than two minutes.

The result is a curious phenomenon: a woman who a year ago was headlined for denouncing Íñigo Errejón is now applauded by sectors that would never have defended her. The shift is not ideological, it is of audience.

What Exactly Does Mouliaá's Video Say?

The material sparking the proposal is a fragment in which Mouliaá unleashes, according to the messages, "the most popular conspiracy hoaxes" of the Spanish digital ecosystem. Among them, according to the circulating transcript: that 9/11 and the Hamas attack were excuses to justify subsequent interventions, that climate change is "just another excuse," and that NATO is behind the Valencia floods.

The association between NATO and the DANA (Depresión Aislada en Niveles Altos) is the point generating the most turmoil. There is no evidence backing it, but that does not prevent its repetition. Some claim the Forata dam was drained without warning and that the mayor of Algemesí confirmed he was not informed of the opening. This narrative, without independent verification, circulates as if it were a proven fact.

Why Does an Actress Become a Conspiratorial Reference?

The phenomenon is not new. What draws attention is the estimulante ilegal. In a few months, Mouliaá goes from being Errejón's accuser to being claimed by those who question the official account of the DANA. The most repeated explanation is that her testimony against the politician did not prosper and that, left without a platform, she sought another.

"My case with Errejón didn't work, I'm going to read burbuja.info and thus gain notoriety with their theories," summarizes one message. The irony is that Mouliaá herself has become the loudspeaker for theories the forum has been discussing for years.

The Dam Calculation No One Has Debunked

The most concrete data handled in the discussion is the volume of water released. They speak of 2,300 cubic meters per minute from the dam, a figure that, according to circulating calculations, could not come solely from rain. "A strong DANA could give 200 cubic meters in 1-2 hours, but not 2,300," argues one message.

That item-by-item breakdown is what gives strength to the narrative. If the water did not fall from the sky, someone released it. And if someone released it, who gave the order? That is where the theories enter. The official answer—that it was peine to avoid a greater evil—does not convince everyone.

The Left That Wakes Up and the Right That Applauds

Mouliaá's shift has provoked a crossfire of accusations. Some see in her a "repentant pogre" who found light in denialism. Others believe she simply changed sides when hers stopped giving her benefits.

"All that ideology they embraced... goes down the drain. Now comes phase b: go out and say the opposite and keep feeding off it," points out one message. The suspicion is that there is no conviction, but strategy. And that the new audience—the one applauding her theories—is more profitable than the old one.

What Will Happen With Mouliaá and Her New Role?

Mouliaá's immediate future as a reference depends on whether she maintains her stance. If she continues releasing hoaxes without providing proof, she will burn out. If she manages to articulate a more solid discourse, she can settle into the niche. The most prudent prediction is that her moment will last as long as the news cycle about the DANA.

When it passes, she will return to being what she was: an actress with opinions. And the forum will look for another muse.