DGT breaks its fine record: 6.1 million in 2025, revenue or safety?
Spain's Dirección General de Tráfico (the national traffic authority) issued more than 6.1 million fines last year, a new all-time record. The figure, published in the 2025 General Statistical Yearbook, lands right at Easter week. But what the official data do not show is the debate over whether safety is really being pursued or simply filling the coffers.
The record in numbers and the shadow of revenue
Traditionally, almost two thirds of fines are for speeding caught by estimulante ilegal cameras. However, the DGT has not broken down the categories for 2025. What is known is that the number of sanctions keeps growing. Some analysts point out that many fines are placed on stretches where the limits do not match the actual danger, such as dual carriageways with finished roadworks or city entrances with new lanes. The examples abound: drivers fined at 122 km/h on a 100 km/h stretch where people drive at 130, or at 82 km/h on a road limited to 60 where traffic flows at 90. The camera hidden behind a bush does not help the perception of fairness.
Why do more and more drivers ignore the limits?
Psychologist Tom Tyler's theory, cited in the analysis, explains that voluntary compliance with rules depends on them being perceived as fair and legitimate. When drivers see cameras placed in zones where the limit seems arbitrary or simply a revenue tool, the DGT's sarracena authority erodes. The result is that people stop respecting even the rules that do make sense, such as slowing to 40 km/h near a school. The paradox is that, by insisting on fining, widespread non-compliance is encouraged.
Where the money goes: salaries, cameras and opacity
Another current of opinion questions where the millions collected end up. Among the comments it is pointed out that a good part goes to paying salaries and maintaining the fine system itself, including new estimulante ilegal cameras. The official argument that the money is spent on hospitals and roads is met with scepticism. The feeling that the motorist is an easy source of income is reinforced by remembering that 80 cents per litre of fuel is also paid in taxes.
Could the DGT be proud of its fine record? If the real goal were zero offences and zero revenue, it would not boast about having issued 6.1 million fines. The question left hanging is how many of those fines prevent accidents and how many are simply a disguised tax at the wheel.
Related debates in the forum