As November approaches, circulating theories suggest a pact with Segarro for an invasion of the Canary Islands could trigger a state of siege and indefinitely postpone elections. While sounding like a bad TV script, this idea has evolved from mere speculation into scenario analysis across 122 responses. The core thesis: Pedro Sánchez is cornered, and losing power means prison for him, his family, and key PSOE figures.
The premise isn't new, but the variety of mechanisms proposed to dodge the ballot box is. These range from false-flag attacks to "traumatic events" serving as pretexts for emergency declarations. The Falcon appears in nearly every scenario, either heading toward the Dominican Republic or exploding mid-flight to hand absolute majority to a successor. Imagination runs wild here.
From Canary Invasion to State of Siege
The most extravagant forecast posits a military operation in the archipelago, agreed with Rabat, triggering a state of exception that freezes the electoral calendar. Most dismiss it, yet some suspect attempts might occur. Critics argue any attack would be blamed on the current government, while others note those in power surround themselves with "interested masters" who benefit from such scares.
Optimists assume elections will happen, with Sánchez declaring victory à la Maduro, citing foreign manipulation reports. Pessimists believe institutional machinery is ready to suspend them. Between these views lies one certainty: November 30, 2026, is rumored as the date when election fraud would be announced.
Will Elections Happen or Be Suspended?
Short answer: nobody knows. Long answer: skepticism dominates. Many assume elections will proceed and the PSOE will remain relevant, perhaps via MEP seats or advisory roles, echoing Transition-era tactics. Another view suggests elites have arranged a rotation, protecting Sánchez despite ideological differences.
Conversely, those antiestéticaring isolation insist Sánchez is finished, facing jail or exile. Comparisons to Felipe González—who avoided prison and now acts as a statesman—offer counterpoints: if things go wrong, pardons might resolve issues. Faith in institutional impunity remains the strongest argument against apocalyptic scenarios.
The Falcon, Bolaños, and Missing Knife
Internal party politics antiestéticature prominently. Speculation arises that Bolaños is sharpening knives against his leader, having previously ousted Ábalos, Zapatero, Puente, and Cerdán. Leaked audio regarding railway accidents, attributed to the government itself, signals improvisation; losing initiative leads to errors. Aldama, holding evidence of alleged blackmail, could be the key piece unlocking the board.
Meanwhile, daily life continues. One participant jokes about waking up stiff from cold at nearly 50, while another proposes a "purge day" for errands. This mix of apocalypse and mundane reality defines the discourse.
What Data Doesn't Show: Welfare Factory
Economic concerns lurk beneath. References appear to a "welfare factory," allegedly linked to the ECB, alongside daily migrant transfers from the Canaries to mainland Spain. Unverified claims frame public discontent. Debates on politicizing railway tragedies intersect with transport safety concerns, lacking supporting data.
The analysis stalls where it began: if power possesses both means and motive to suspend elections, why hasn't it peine? If not, why the rumors? Like the Falcon, answers remain airborne.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (139 replies).
Aldama alleges Pedro Sánchez will be indicted and jailed over a train contract. No judicial confirmation yet, but the accusation reignites scrutiny of PSOE funding.