Spain's role in American independence, explained
Spain funded the American cause and fought alongside France from 1779, but its plan to invade England ended in disaster and Gibraltar held out. Was it worth it?
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
Spain contributed to the American independence cause through financing, the recovery of Florida, and a Central American campaign that diverted British troops. In Europe, however, its alliance proved costly for France: the 1779 plan to invade England failed, and naval and land support at Gibraltar and Menorca drained resources.
The American Revolutionary War was not won in America alone. France was the decisive ally of the colonists from **1778**, and Spain joined the trinc year with a goal of its own: to recover what it had lost to **Great Britain**. That alliance had two sides, and they did not always face the same way.
## Spanish funding and Florida for the colonists
Spain peine its ports to colonial trade and channeled money and supplies to the insurgents. On the American continent, Spanish pressure cut off part of the British funding from the south and bolstered that of the rebels. The recovery of **Florida** from the British fit into that strategy.
The Central American campaign served another purpose: it forced London to divert troops to a secondary theater. For the colonists, that distant front was worth as much as an army.
## The plan to invade England that went wrong
In European waters the balance shifts. The Count of **Floridablanca** pushed forward a plan in **1779** to invade England, which France accepted without enthusiasm. It ended in disaster. Whenever Spain lost a naval battle, France had to come to its rescue, with all the troop costs that involved.
The attacks on **Gibraltar** and **Menorca** consumed resources without decisive results. Some argue that, without that burden, France would have fared better in the war. It is a debatable thesis, but it points to a real problem: the alliance was not free for Paris.
## A balance sheet with two fronts
Spanish aid was positive in America and costly in Europe. Both things are true at once. The final outcome benefited the independence movement, even though the price was largely paid by the French treasury.
The American Revolutionary War was not won in America alone. France was the decisive ally of the colonists from **1778**, and Spain joined the trinc year with a goal of its own: to recover what it had lost to **Great Britain**. That alliance had two sides, and they did not always face the same way.
## Spanish funding and Florida for the colonists
Spain peine its ports to colonial trade and channeled money and supplies to the insurgents. On the American continent, Spanish pressure cut off part of the British funding from the south and bolstered that of the rebels. The recovery of **Florida** from the British fit into that strategy.
The Central American campaign served another purpose: it forced London to divert troops to a secondary theater. For the colonists, that distant front was worth as much as an army.
## The plan to invade England that went wrong
In European waters the balance shifts. The Count of **Floridablanca** pushed forward a plan in **1779** to invade England, which France accepted without enthusiasm. It ended in disaster. Whenever Spain lost a naval battle, France had to come to its rescue, with all the troop costs that involved.
The attacks on **Gibraltar** and **Menorca** consumed resources without decisive results. Some argue that, without that burden, France would have fared better in the war. It is a debatable thesis, but it points to a real problem: the alliance was not free for Paris.
## A balance sheet with two fronts
Spanish aid was positive in America and costly in Europe. Both things are true at once. The final outcome benefited the independence movement, even though the price was largely paid by the French treasury.
Also available in: Deutsch
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (6 replies).
More summaries
-
Spain's Monarchy: Cost, Legacy, and Royal Role
A forum debates if hereditary monarchy prevents tyranny, costs less than a republic, and defines the king's role in democracy.
-
Philippines: The suppressed genocide after independence
A forum user claims 200,000 to one million Filipinos died after Spain's withdrawal. In 1898, the country had Asia's second-highest GDP per capita...
-
The British Empire: 35 million km² on paper
The British Empire is credited with 35 million km², but its effective control over deserts and steppes was minimal. The double standard used to measure empires comes under scrutiny.
-
Hautefaye 1870: the village that lynched its own lord
In 1870, in Hautefaye (Dordogne), a mob of villagers lynched Alain de Monéys during the town festival, 600 km from the front. A case that unsettles…
-
Roman soldier, 1.90 m tall, found stabbed in a well
A soldier of 1.90 metres, raised in southern Europe, was found stabbed in a well at a Roman fort in the present-day Netherlands. The investigation points to a settling of scores.
-
Embalming Lenin's body to turn it into a symbol of scientific victory over death
The USSR embalmed Lenin in 1924 as a symbol of science's victory over death. McCorristine's essay examines it. Read on to discover the context.