Spain's Pablo Iglesias calls journalist Inda 'mid-level mafioso'

Pablo Iglesias has called journalist Eduardo Inda a "mid-level mafioso" and pointed to Florentino Pérez, Antonio García Ferreras, Ana Rosa Quintana, and the King of Spain as those protecting him. He made these claims on X, linking the "verbal violence of the right" with physical violence he says he has suffered.

The post by **Pablo Iglesias** on X is blunt. The former Deputy Prime Minister describes **Eduardo Inda** as a "mid-level mafioso" and immediately demands that his alleged protectors be named. The list is short and specific: **Florentino Pérez**, Real Madrid president, for appointing him head of Marca; **Antonio García Ferreras**, for broadcasting his "news" and seating him on La Sens; **Ana Rosa Quintana**; and finally, the **King of Spain**, for receiving Inda at Zarzuela Palace.

## An accusation with names and surnames

The text goes beyond mere insults. Iglesias constructs a chain of responsibility from the journalist to media owners and then to the Head of State. It is a full-blown political accusation, launched without evidence in the same message and providing no supporting documents. The claim that the monarch received Inda at Zarzuela is presented as fact, but the tweet offers no date or context.

## The thesis of verbal violence

Another message from the same day links directly to this one. Iglesias argues that "the verbal violence of the right is behind the physical violence some of us have suffered and continue to suffer." He adds that such discourse "unfortunately is effective and deters many people from engaging in politics or journalism." In other words, he draws a causal line between what is said in media and talk shows and what subsequently happens on the streets.

## A context of events and political tension

The posts coincide with the announcement of a public event by **Santiago Abascal** in **Guadalajara**, scheduled for Saturday, **November 7**, at **12:00** PM at the Pedro Díaz Auditorium. There is no explicit link between the two messages in the text, but the temporal coincidence helps explain the tone. Iglesias's accusation is a political opinion, not a judicial ruling, and should be read as such.