The King speaks about Ceuta, but the institutional damage is already done
The King's silence during the first days of the Ceuta crisis has become the big headline of an emergency that already has far too many. While the autonomous city was managing a mass arrival of people across its borders, the Head of State and Captain General of the Armed Forces said nothing. When he finally issued a statement of "outrage", public discontent had already settled into an uncomfortable question: why so much silence?
The official response, later leaked to the media, was brief: "The State must ensure security and prevent these events from happening again." Institutionally correct words, but they came after he had been seen in Mallorca with his new boat, whose preparation for the Copa del Rey became the perfect counterpoint to the emergency on the southern border. The boat's cost, around one million euros, fuelled the comparison between the monarch's priorities and those of the public.
The million-euro yacht and the shadow of indifference
The criticism was not only aimed at the absence of an early statement. The detail of the boat, bought for a sporting competition, rubbed salt into the wound. While the migration response was being coordinated, the Royal Household did not offer even a gesture. Those who came to the Crown's defence pointed out that the monarch did show interest in the situation with a phone call to the president of Ceuta. A discreet gesture that, for his defenders, was enough: the Constitution gives him no executive role in crisis management. For his critics, however, the Captain General cannot stand aside when the integrity of the territory is at stake.
High treason: the debate that reached the Penal Code
The discontent moved on to more treacherous ground: the accusation of high treason. Articles 582 and 583 of Organic Law 10/1995, the Penal Code, were invoked, which punish with prison sentences of twelve to twenty years any Spaniard who helps the enemy enter Spain or favours its advance. An extreme interpretation with no judicial prospects, but one that reflects how far disaffection has gone. The historical parallel completed the picture: it was recalled that the current King's father, Juan Carlos I, handed over the Sahara and that, according to that narrative, history could repeat itself with Ceuta and Melilla. The Canary Islands were even mentioned as the next flashpoint.
The next time the country is in flames, all eyes will be on the Zarzuela Palace from minute one. And the silence, justified this time as institutional agenda, will be judged with less indulgence. Meanwhile, the conclusion of these days of crisis is uncomfortable: when the Crown was needed most, it chose rhetoric. And rhetoric, at a moment of real emergency, sounds like an excuse.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (77 replies).
Pedro Sánchez insists the King has been in power for over 20 years, but Felipe VI ascended in 2014. The criticism regarding Ceuta and Melilla hides a deeper debate...
Italy has reintroduced Schengen checks on passengers from Spain, and Sánchez demands they be lifted before August 9 in an official note described as unusually harsh.
The Cifuentes precedent shows that in Spain's PP it is not a judge who brings a politician down, it is the party. Ayuso remains untouchable as long as it suits party headquarters.
Three women were removed from public swimming pools in Burgos, Spain, for wearing a burkini. The mayor defends the hygiene rules, but a discrimination debate is growing.