Spanish bond hits 4.079% while risk premium marks 48 points
On September 24, Spain's ten-year bond touched 4.079%, its highest level since 2013. On that same day, the German Bund was trading at 3.597%. The difference results in a risk premium of 48 basis points. With these figures, the thesis that Spain is entering a free fall toward the 7.68% seen in 2012 is hard to sustain: euro-denominated money has become more expensive for everyone, not just for the Spanish Treasury.
The diagnosis running through the analysis is that the party is over. Bailouts, all manner of aid, uncontrolled debt, and public spending that makes no distinction between investment and waste. The difference with 2012 is one of scale: back then, the 7.6% came with a premium above 600 points because the market doubted Spain specifically. Now the entire block is rising, with Germany at 3.6%, which is hardly a country under suspicion.
What the Spanish bond market says in September
Technical reading and macro reading are at odds. Part of the analysis argues that the last resistance has broken and that the yield curve no longer responds to usual control mechanisms: intervening to contain it fuels inflation, and inflation pushes the bond back up again. A loop without manual brakes.
Opposing this is the differential argument. If the Bund is at 3.597% and the Spanish bond at 4.079%, the risk premium is around 48 basis points, a level that would have seemed like science fiction in 2012. The cost increase is due to euro money, not country risk. This nuance separates a scare from a debt crisis.
The counterargument has its own flaw: this same story was told in 2010 and 2011, when the Bund was around 2% and it was said here that it was a problem for everyone. Then the ECB stopped buying and the Spanish premium shot to 600 in three news cycles, with Germany at 1.5%. The market distinguishes between a country and a block when it suits them. That the Bund is now at 3.6% protects no one; it only confirms that money is expensive for everyone.
How much does refinancing Spanish public debt cost?
The figures handled in the analysis are dizzying. In interest alone, Spain pays about €40 billion a year. The principal continues to grow at a rate of €100 billion annually. With that volume of refinancing, each percentage point translates into billions of extra costs coming from somewhere: healthcare, salaries, or pocketbook via prices.
The complete calculation, broken down item by item, yields a surprising difference. The domestic translation is well known: if the bond rises, the Euribor lags behind but eventually catches up, and those who signed variable-rate mortgages in 2021 discover that the bargain was a trap. The silent tax doesn't appear in the BOE (Official Gazette); it appears in the shopping basket.
Why the 2012 bailout didn't rescue Spain
The 2012 bailout did not rescue Spain: it rescued German and French creditors holding our debt, using money from here and from those coming after. This time the wrapper will be different: mechanism, secondary market purchase, stability instrument. The headline will be sensationalist; the payment will be real.
The likely path won't be a traditional bailout, but the ECB buying debt wholesale. That is called monetization and is paid for at the supermarket, not in offices. It is a tax that doesn't appear in the BOE. The question isn't whether there will be intervention, but who signs the bill.
GDP grows, but GDP per capita does not
The 2.6% growth collapses once you subtract 4.9% inflation. According to circulating calculations, the result is a real growth of -2.3%. Debt-to-GDP is an easily manipulated indicator: Argentina has it at 84% and the country is devastated. Look at GDP per capita instead.
Criticism points to the composition of growth: high inflation, massive population inflow, and public spending inflate the numerator without accompanying income per inhabitant. European funds are running out, retirees and civil servants increase by 100,000 or 200,000 each year, and the interest line skyrockets. Years of heavy burden lie ahead, with the warning that INE (National Statistics Institute) figures depend on who runs the INE.
Who pays the bill when cuts arrive?
The question hovering over the analysis is where the first cuts will go: allowances, waste projects, pensions, or state services. The historical pattern repeats with clockwork precision: governments squander for years, leave the country on the brink of bankruptcy, and leave; the next turn comes, unpopular measures are taken, unions and supporters make a fuss, and a few years later the first group returns. Spain is beyond repair, concludes the bleakest reading.
The other front is external. The risk premium is nothing more than the rent charged for continuing to live beyond your means. And that rent is paid by the taxpayer, not the elite. We cannot disconnect our bond from others': if France falls, Germany falls, and we all fall. The doubt is who bails out the bailers.
The warning nobody wants to read
A crisis affects everyone, hitting especially hard those living off handouts. That is the warning issued by part of the analysis, with the same coldness used to look at a chart. Meanwhile, private sector workers see how printed money reaches only a few pockets.
The exact point where the analysis gets stuck is this: if the bond spikes to 5%, 6%, or 8%, the coming inflation will be 20% or more, and no indexed fund will beat that return. Nobody yet knows if the German Bund will hold the rope or if the Spanish premium will detach first. The data is on the table. The conclusion is in the air.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (120 replies).
Putin and Lukashenko activate their nuclear forces amid a scenario of military escalation. A critical analysis of the real impact and the debate in the forum.