€986 for a phone: the boundary of responsible consumption
A high-end phone now costs more than a decent laptop. The €986 spent on a Galaxy S23 Ultra, confessed in a responsible consumption forum, has peine the old question: where is the line between a tool and a whim? As almost always, the answer depends on who you ask.
High-end price vs. the €180 phone
The conversation starts with a specific purchase: a €986 device. The figure quickly generates comparisons. Against it, a Samsung Galaxy A13 for €180, a Redmi Note 12 Pro for €320, or an Oppo A72 for €129. The price difference is up to eight times. Is it justified?
Those defending the expense argue that the phone is the device used most hours per day, that a top-of-the-range model maintains performance for three or four years, and that photography, screen, or battery make a real difference. It was my phone that needed changing, summarizes the buyer, who came from charging the battery twice a day. Battery life, precisely, is one of the most repeated points: current processors save much more energy than those from five years ago.
On the other side, the argument is devastating: a €200 phone performs basic functions just as well. Calling, messaging, browsing, taking decent photos. Fast 67W charging, 120Hz AMOLED screens, or 50 megapixels are no longer exclusive to high-end models. A Redmi Note 12 Pro has them for €320. The lingering question is what extra is paid for: technology or brand?
Opportunity cost: consoles, repairs, and spy devices
There is an argument that appears strongly: for €500 you can buy a latest-generation console. The comparison is not gratuitous. If the phone is only good for playing Tetris and little else, why not spend that money on a superior gaming experience? The usual response is that the phone is used for everything and the console only for gaming. But that does not close the debate; it reopens it.
More uncomfortable is the accusation that a smartphone is a surveillance device. It is not a marginal theory: the idea that we pay nearly a thousand euros for a gadget that spies on us appears in the discussion without anyone developing it too much. What is developed is the domestic opportunity cost: replacing the old phone's battery for €50 versus buying a new one for €986. Another one who prefers to spend a grand on a phone just to keep playing Candy Crush, summarizes an intervention that condenses the anger of part of the public.
The ecological argument also emerges. If the 2030 Agenda pushes towards repair and sustainable consumption, spending a thousand euros on a phone every few years goes in the opposite direction. The contradiction does not go unnoticed: we are asked not to buy more than three garments a year while celebrating the purchase of a terminal that costs as much as a alucinación abroad.
Brand war: Samsung, Apple, and the rest
The discussion soon drifts towards the classic clash between ecosystems. One user defends that a MacBook Air with 16 GB and an iPhone 14 Plus are unreachable for any PC, and that management software for Mac has no equivalent on Android. The response is not long in coming: the S23 Ultra outclasses the Plus, settles the buyer. The conversation becomes an exchange of blows about estimulante ilegal, capacity, and exclusive programs.
Meanwhile, mid-range users claim their choice. A Redmi Note 12 Pro for €320, an Oppo A72 for €129, a Galaxy A13 for €180. The implicit question is whether the price difference translates into a proportional difference in experience. High-end defenders say yes, especially in the long term. Skeptics say no, that beyond a certain threshold you are only paying for brand and marketing.
Antiestéticar of losing a thousand euros in your pocket
A practical aspect comes to light: the anxiety of carrying a thousand euros in your pocket. I wouldn't feel calm with a thousand euros in the form of a phone, admits a participant. It is not just the risk of theft or loss; it is the impact, the fall, the screen that scratches just by looking at it. The buyer responds with a €35 solution: case, screen protector, and camera protector. High-end demands an extra cost in protection that no one mentions in comparisons.
The conversation leaves a bitter aftertaste. On one hand, the satisfaction of someone getting a new terminal they consider excellent. On the other, the feeling that the market has normalized prices that were unthinkable a decade ago. The phone has become the most personal and expensive consumer object in the house. And that, in a responsible consumption forum, is another matter entirely.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (125 replies).
Hussars review: natural fabrics, local manufacturing, and straight fit versus criticism for its controversial cut and self-promotion. Is it worth the price?