You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Securitas Direct Alarms: Marketing vs Reality
Security guards and clients report ignored alarms, price hikes, and difficult cancellations. Do these systems offer real protection or just expensive peace of mind?
A security guard from an alarm company described the situation bluntly: signals triggered constantly, nobody responded, and monitoring center operators often missed calls because they were on breaks. This detailed account highlights the gap between advertising promises and actual performance when an alarm sounds. The uncomfortable question remains: do these systems work, or are they just expensive placebos?
The Alarm Business: Fees, Salespeople, and Fine Print
Customer experiences reveal a common pattern: recurring price increases, persistent sales tactics, and unwanted services added to bills. One former client summarized it: "They only raised prices and tried to sneak in extra services." Cancelling can become an ordeal; some users waited six months to terminate contracts. Meanwhile, the alarm continues generating monthly fees.
According to testimonials, the business model relies on aggressive sales and forced loyalty. Sales representatives reportedly lack technical training—just a two-hour course before hitting the streets. This leads to poor installations that cause subsequent problems. The paradox is that the alarm device itself works if properly installed with fresh batteries; the issue lies in the surrounding ecosystem.
Do They Alert Police When Alarms Trigger?
No. That is the repeated conclusion. Regulations limit direct police notifications by private companies, and in practice, law enforcement is not called. Monitoring centers typically contact the subscriber or send internal alerts at best. If the owner is absent, the alarm becomes a meaningless beep.
Consequently, response times drag out. Burglars know this. Several reports indicate that thieves understand these widespread alarms perfectly and know how to neutralize or ignore them. The sense of security sold is often an illusion.
Alternatives: Ajax, Wired Systems, and Independent Monitoring
Buying your own system and connecting it to an independent monitoring center is gaining popularity. Ajax is cited as a safer alternative without abusive fees. One year's subscription cost can equal the price of better equipment you own outright.
Consulted installers emphasize two keys: wired systems beat wireless ones, and devices should transmit on multiple frequencies to resist jammers. Securitas alarms reportedly include frequency inhibitors, making them vulnerable. The recommendation is clear: if choosing wireless, ensure high quality and real technical support.
Insurance and Fine Print
Installing an alarm may lower home insurance premiums, but a detail is often overlooked: failing to arm it when leaving could void coverage during theft. Users warn that declaring an alarm to insurers binds them to constant activation, risking loss of protection. Policy fine print often requires connection to a monitoring center or window bars for chalet theft coverage.
The final paradox: paying for a sense of security that may neither deter crime nor cover damages. Meanwhile, industry players continue inflating fees with unwanted services.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (23 replies).
Without a power bill since June: TotalEnergies and O2 customers go months without a receipt while their contracts remain active and meters keep running.