Robotaxis have been running for 7 years in some places. What about Spain?
Robotaxis have been in service for 7 years in Guangzhou, according to a post on X. In Spain there is no commercial driverless robotaxi service. We explain why.
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
A post on X claims that driverless robotaxis have been operating in Guangzhou (China) for 7 years. In Spain, there is no commercial driverless robotaxi service open to the public.
The post on X by Li Zexin is brief and to the point: driverless robotaxis have been in service for seven years in Guangzhou, China, and it is "no longer a new technology." The date of the post is not specified in the message, but the claim it makes is verifiable: autonomous passenger vehicles have been operating in Guangzhou for years, with permits to drive without a safety driver on board.
## What the post actually says
The message is not talking about pilot trials or closed demonstrations. It talks about service. That changes the scale of the matter: this is not a prototype on a test track, it is a car picking up passengers in a city of more than 18 million people. The post does not detail the operating company or the number of vehicles, so those gaps should not be filled with assumptions.
## The Spanish case: trials, not commercial service
In Spain there are no driverless robotaxis in commercial service. There are permits for trials with a safety driver on public roads, and some regions have regulated those tests. The difference with Guangzhou is not technological but regulatory: a trial permit is not the same as a service open to the public. Anyone looking today for a taxi with no one at the wheel in Madrid or Barcelona will not find one.
## Why the difference between trial and service matters
Seven years of operation in a real city generate data no simulator can produce: millions of kilometres, incidents, weather, pedestrians. That track record is the asset that separates those already providing service from those still running tests. The post highlights exactly that: the technology stopped being a novelty in Guangzhou. In Spain, the debate is still at the earlier stage.
The practical conclusion for the reader is simple: if someone tells you robotaxis are already old news, they are right about Guangzhou and wrong about Spain. And if they tell you they are the future, it is worth asking them in which city.
The post on X by Li Zexin is brief and to the point: driverless robotaxis have been in service for seven years in Guangzhou, China, and it is "no longer a new technology." The date of the post is not specified in the message, but the claim it makes is verifiable: autonomous passenger vehicles have been operating in Guangzhou for years, with permits to drive without a safety driver on board.
## What the post actually says
The message is not talking about pilot trials or closed demonstrations. It talks about service. That changes the scale of the matter: this is not a prototype on a test track, it is a car picking up passengers in a city of more than 18 million people. The post does not detail the operating company or the number of vehicles, so those gaps should not be filled with assumptions.
## The Spanish case: trials, not commercial service
In Spain there are no driverless robotaxis in commercial service. There are permits for trials with a safety driver on public roads, and some regions have regulated those tests. The difference with Guangzhou is not technological but regulatory: a trial permit is not the same as a service open to the public. Anyone looking today for a taxi with no one at the wheel in Madrid or Barcelona will not find one.
## Why the difference between trial and service matters
Seven years of operation in a real city generate data no simulator can produce: millions of kilometres, incidents, weather, pedestrians. That track record is the asset that separates those already providing service from those still running tests. The post highlights exactly that: the technology stopped being a novelty in Guangzhou. In Spain, the debate is still at the earlier stage.
The practical conclusion for the reader is simple: if someone tells you robotaxis are already old news, they are right about Guangzhou and wrong about Spain. And if they tell you they are the future, it is worth asking them in which city.
Also available in: Deutsch
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (1 replies).
More summaries
-
Why PP and Vox may be handing Spain's Senate to the left
A tweet accuses Spain's PP and Vox of handing the Senate's absolute majority to the left by refusing to run on joint lists. We explain what the upper house is worth and why it matters.
-
How to remove that automatic summary header shown in some threads
Learn how to remove the automatic summary header on websites using custom filters in uBlock Origin and browsers like Brave.
-
The Masonic symbols some people see in the Vatican
A photo from the Vatican sparks conspiracy theories: a covered eye, a patchwork cross and red-robed cardinals. How much of it is true?
-
Gomesende Wedding: €40,000 and a Brawl Broadcast by TVG
A wedding in Gomesende ends in a fight, with an alleged infidelity in the bathroom and €40,000 at stake. TVG broadcasts videos of the ceremony.
-
Nando, the online character who declares himself the sharpest mind on the planet
A character proclaims himself the sharpest mind on the planet, demands a million euros per child from every parent and calls for the collective euthanasia of the human species.
-
Our engineers
An eight-month account from an engineering project describes abandoned wells and day laborers who quit work by midday. Is it laziness or a lack of incentives?