You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
robin.jobs: Dutch temp agency with housing that won't answer
A jobseeker sends his ID and driving licence to robin.jobs, a Dutch temp agency with no reviews, no social media activity and poor fraud-checker scores.
The Dutch temp agency robin.jobs that promises housing and doesn't answer
Looking for work outside Spain has become an act of faith. The offer has the perfect hook: a job in the Netherlands with company-provided housing, no upfront costs and a contract. The problem appears when the candidate types the agency's name and finds not a single review. That's what peine to a jobseeker who had spent weeks sending CVs through various temp agencies and who, lulled by routine, ended up sending robin.jobs a photocopy of his ID and driving licence.
The website, according to the checkers he himself consulted, doesn't come out well. Scamadviser gives it a very low score, and analyses by scamvoid, scam-detector and urlvoid point in the same direction. The company's Facebook page is, in his own words, "a wasteland". And nobody answers the phone number on the website. Zero reviews, zero activity and zero response: three signs that, together, hardly inspire optimism.
Netherlands, temp agencies and housing: the repeating pattern
The robin.jobs case doesn't exist in a vacuum. Several participants recall having read or known firsthand experiences of temp work in the Netherlands that start the same way and end worse. Zero-hours contracts, shifts that change every other day and notifications after the day has already started. One of the stories circulating describes a worker who could be told at 10 p.m. to start at 6 a.m.
Housing is the other pillar of the model. Some describe campsites in the middle of nowhere with cabins shared by four people, and others claim the cost of that room ends up deducted from the payslip. The idea, summed up in a phrase that gets repeated: working to pay for the place where you sleep and waiting there when there's no work. It's even said that locals avoided passing through that kind of compound.
Is it worth the risk?
Here the analysis splits in two. One camp argues that, as long as they don't demand exclusivity for a period or money upfront, the gamble pays off: you try it and, if you don't like it, you change. The worst decision, they say, is indecision. The other half responds that the problem isn't the risk, but its price: documents handed over to who knows whom and a job return that may never come.
Against that, the most concrete advice offered is verifiable in two minutes: check whether the agency is registered as an employer agent in the EURES network. It's the minimum filter that any intermediary operating legally within the European Union passes.
What to do if you've already handed over your documents
The affected person has already taken action: he went to a Guardia Civil station to explain what peine and, according to his account, a warning has been issued in case someone tries to use his ID or driving licence to commit fraud. The recommendation that prevails is not to wait for absolute certainty: report it and leave a trail as soon as possible.
Meanwhile, the doubt remains open. The agency doesn't answer the phone, its digital footprint is almost non-existent and the checks point to the worst. Verification with EURES was left pending at the exact moment the conversation was cut off. That's where everything stopped.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (33 replies).
Without a power bill since June: TotalEnergies and O2 customers go months without a receipt while their contracts remain active and meters keep running.