Red Cross in Ceuta: the aid that slowed migrant returns

The Red Cross received 600 million from the Spanish Government in 2023. The aid arrived as migrants were heading home and the returns slowed. A pull effect?

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

The aid in Ceuta that may have prolonged the migration crisis

Second day of the crisis in Ceuta. The migrants who had crossed the border were beginning to return. Food was running short and voluntary returns were moving forward. Suddenly, the humanitarian teams launched food distribution. The departures stopped and the crisis became entrenched.

The effect of food aid at a transit point

The sequence is part of the critical account of migration management: when the pressure disappears due to lack of resources, the solution is to let the cycle close on its own. The humanitarian aid intervention broke that process and pinned the population at the crossing point. It is not an effect sought by aid workers, but the economics of migration has these paradoxes: aid reduces the cost of waiting.

600 million in grants and a shadow of conflict

The controversy does not stop on the ground. According to published figures, the Red Cross received more than 600 million euros in grants from the Spanish Government in 2023. And the vice-president of its Foundation is the partner of the Foreign Minister. The analysis of the NGO's funding points to a conflict of interest that few prosecutors' offices want to face head-on.

On the margins there are unverified reports of NGOs that would have handed defense material to migrants. There is no official investigation, but the mere fact that it is raised reveals how far the distrust has gone.

The uncomfortable question remains open: if material aid reduces the urgency of leaving, where is the line drawn between humanitarian assistance and a pull effect?

Also available in: Deutsch

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (17 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

Back