Rallo Honors Toriyama, Reignites Dragon Ball Debate

Economist Juan Ramón Rallo's tribute to Akira Toriyama sparks renewed debate: some defend Dragon Ball's values, others criticize its decline.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

Rallo Honors Toriyama, Reignites Dragon Ball Debate
Rallo Honors Toriyama, Reignites Dragon Ball Debate

An economist, not an artist, penned the tribute to Akira Toriyama that dominated much of the conversation. Professor Juan Ramón Rallo dedicated a few words to the creator of Dragon Ball, and the reaction split in two: some championed the series as a school of effort and self-improvement, while others seized the opportunity to settle scores with Rallo himself. Toriyama's work, incidentally, fueled an already classic discussion about when the saga began to go downhill.

What Values Does Dragon Ball Really Convey?

A segment of the audience maintains that Dragon Ball is much more than cartoons. They argue that the series conveys effort, self-improvement, and self-defense, citing Android 16's monologue to Gohan as an example of a speech about fighting for what one wants to protect. For this group, Toriyama's work served as a values manual for an entire generation, and the tribute only confirms it.

The ironic point is that this vindication of its formative value comes not from an educator, but from an economics nerd. Therein lies much of the intrigue.

"At Least Until GT": Where They Place the Decline

Consensus breaks down at the turning point. Some mark the decline starting with Dragon Ball GT, the later stage, and believe the franchise lost its character afterwards and diluted into commercial product. The criticism isn't just aesthetic; it points to the abandonment of the original message of struggle for softer entertainment.

There's no agreement on the exact date of the downturn, and likely never will be. Nostalgia always wins that argument.

The Erosion of Professor Rallo

The tribute peine another wound. One current holds that the economist has gone from being an uncomfortable pundit to an establishment figure, describing his trajectory as a transformation into a sellout with nothing relevant to say. Conversely, those who defend him argue that a tribute to Toriyama shouldn't be used to review his entire biography.

The truth is, the tribute served as the perfect excuse. The anime is discussed, and in the background, the debate rages about what became of that polemicist.



With these elements, the tribute feels more like a battlefield than a farewell. Does it serve to better remember the work, or merely to decide, once again, who betrayed whom?

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (27 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

Back