You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Polar vortex could split in November, say models — with caveats
A viral message claims models point to a polar vortex breakdown in November, something unseen since the 1950s. Science notes it usually happens later in winter.
The polar vortex could break down in November, and gas is still at record highs
Can a polar vortex collapse be taken for granted before winter even begins? That is what a message circulating these days claims: current models would point to a vortex breakdown in early November, something that, according to that same text, would never have peine since records began in the 1950s. The frigid Arctic air would be released from the pole. And with gas at record highs, the news arrives just when it is time to look at the bill.
The announcement has a hook. It also has fine print, and plenty of it.
What the polar vortex is and why it breaks down
The polar vortex is a ring of very strong westerly winds located in the stratosphere, between 10 and 50 kilometers above the Arctic, which keeps cold air locked over the pole. It forms every autumn and strengthens through the winter. When people say it breaks down, they are describing a sudden stratospheric warming: within a few days the polar stratosphere warms by 30 to 50 degrees, the winds slow down or even reverse, and the vortex shifts or splits in two.
The key is frequency. It happens about six times a decade, almost always between January and February. In late October, taking it for granted is a big assumption. The announcement itself wraps everything in a "according to current models" without giving a single figure.
The surface effect arrives with a delay
Even if the breakdown happens, the cold does not land the next day. The surface effect takes between two and four weeks to be felt. And it does not always bring what the headline suggests: around two out of three times it leads to episodes of intense cold, which leaves a third of the occasions when the stratospheric collapse amounts to nothing but a high-altitude anecdote.
Hence the popular translation of the phenomenon is far more modest. A winter. With a few days of real cold, the kind that hits minus ten degrees, and a decent snowfall or two. Nothing that has not been seen before.
The wardrobe and the bill calendar
While the models argue, the household logistics are already underway. Some people have brought forward the purchase of a fleece loungewear set with an animal print, so they can jump out of bed without layering up clothes in the hallway. The forecast, in this case, is financial: the expense was already budgeted last year.
Folk wisdom, that long-range model, also has its say. In February the dog looks for shade, but late in the month, not early. And you do not take off your coat until the fortieth of May. Popular wisdom does not issue press releases, but it rarely fails as badly as a November headline.
The other version: the warm winter
Against the story of the icy collapse there are those who claim exactly the opposite: that it will be the warmest and driest winter on record. And the next one, the same. It is the usual tension, two opposite forecasts based on the same data with no shared certainty.
The dry irony comes from the calendar: every year a new name appears for what used to be plain old winter. Polar vortex, explosive cyclogenesis, hypertensive supercell. The phenomenon is real. The apocalypse, for now, is a hypothesis.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (31 replies).
The collapse of the stratospheric polar vortex sparks debate: is it a natural cycle or driven by climate change? We analyze the echoes of this uncertainty.
Riots in France: home invasions and the debate over whether this is the start of a civil war. An analysis of impunity and the collapse of public order.
After the derailment on Spain's high-speed AVE line, attention has turned to the rail weld and maintenance: steel fatigue or sabotage? The data does not yet settle it.
Adif's traffic control ordered a stopped train to proceed at normal speed. The rulebook distinguishes between a track fault and a train fault, and productivity pressures discourage checking it.
A forum user claims ADIF fills part of its workforce with INECO and TRAGSA staff without civil service exams, and that project contracts are handed out behind closed doors, excluding…