Per Gessle Replaces Marie Fredriksson in Roxette to Keep Profits

Per Gessle hired Lena Philipsson to replace Marie Fredriksson, maintaining Roxette's revenue stream while controlling 90% of the business.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

Roxette Without Marie: Per Gessle’s Business Move to Keep Earning with a New Vocalist

When Marie Fredriksson passed away in 2019, many assumed Roxette was finished. However, co-founder and songwriter Per Gessle had no intention of closing the cash register. His solution: replace the original vocalist with Lena Philipsson, a 55-year-old Swedish singer who had previously competed in Eurovision. The controversy is inevitable, but from an economic standpoint, the move makes business sense.

Who Really Controls the Roxette Business

Per Gessle wrote all of the group’s hit songs and owns both the band name and the catalog. According to discussions on the matter, his net worth stands at approximately €190 million, including a collection of Ferraris. "Per Gessle is essentially Roxette," analysts argue. While Marie Fredriksson provided the voice, creative control and rights always remained with Gessle. In fact, he sang half of the group’s 19 number-one hits.

Vocalist Swap as Brand Strategy

Replacing a deceased singer with another may sound like heresy to fans, but it is common practice in the music industry when a band name is worth millions. Gessle had previously tested this model with another vocalist, Agnes, before ultimately choosing Philipsson, who already had Eurovision experience. "He understands that music is his business and maximizes its potential," supporters claim. Roxette’s world tours have become nostalgia products that continue to sell tickets, with the new vocalist being a hired employee rather than a partner.

Scam or Smart Marketing?

Opinions are divided. Some view it as a deception: "With 50% of the group missing, they hire another vocalist and people just accept it." Others defend it by noting that Gessle owns the name and 90% of the creative work. "Everyone spends their money how they wish," pragmatists conclude. The reality is that as long as tickets keep selling, the model works. The question remains: how long will nostalgia without Marie last?

The Surprising Fact

Despite the controversy, Gessle remains an active artist with solo projects and his other band. He does not need Roxette to make a living, but he does use it to monetize a catalog that continues to generate income. What purists see as a scam, the businessman views simply as asset management.

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (168 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

Back