Nine and a half years in prison for 'training' an AI with bones
Spanish prosecutors seek 9.5 years for desecrating 11 graves and building a database to train AI. The story falls apart on the legal side.
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
9.5 years in prison for a cemetery 'data center'
A private individual claims Spanish prosecutors are seeking nine and a half years in prison for turning eleven graves into AI training material. The story, circulating these days, describes a nighttime operation in a funeral grounds: opening niches, extracting remains, photographing 327 tombs and copying their records. The stated goal would be to feed a system with biological data. None of these claims is verified.
Why Article 197 does not hold up the charge
The legal part of the story falls apart on its own. The classic Article 197, the one on data protection, requires identifying living people: a handful of bones does not yield a useful genetic profile without a reference database of the living, which nobody here has. And breaking and entering does not cover funeral grounds. That is the point made by an analysis accompanying the case, which exposes the technical fragility of the alleged prosecutorial brief.
Some argue the charge is an abuse of the judicial apparatus against an inconvenient private individual; against it weighs the fact that everyone, author included, admits the fable-like tone. The story grows with each reply, adds crimes as the audience asks for more, and ends up rated 0.5 out of 10 by its own audience.
The uncomfortable question is not whether someone desecrated graves to train an AI. It is how much of this kind of story is already slipping into public conversation as if it were fact.
A private individual claims Spanish prosecutors are seeking nine and a half years in prison for turning eleven graves into AI training material. The story, circulating these days, describes a nighttime operation in a funeral grounds: opening niches, extracting remains, photographing 327 tombs and copying their records. The stated goal would be to feed a system with biological data. None of these claims is verified.
Why Article 197 does not hold up the charge
The legal part of the story falls apart on its own. The classic Article 197, the one on data protection, requires identifying living people: a handful of bones does not yield a useful genetic profile without a reference database of the living, which nobody here has. And breaking and entering does not cover funeral grounds. That is the point made by an analysis accompanying the case, which exposes the technical fragility of the alleged prosecutorial brief.
Some argue the charge is an abuse of the judicial apparatus against an inconvenient private individual; against it weighs the fact that everyone, author included, admits the fable-like tone. The story grows with each reply, adds crimes as the audience asks for more, and ends up rated 0.5 out of 10 by its own audience.
The uncomfortable question is not whether someone desecrated graves to train an AI. It is how much of this kind of story is already slipping into public conversation as if it were fact.
Also available in: Deutsch
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (22 replies).
More summaries
-
Aging is satanic: the theory that sees cemeteries as data centers
A fringe movement claims aging is satanic and that cemeteries are data centers for AIs. The theory doesn't hold up to scrutiny, but it reveals real anxieties.
-
Alcàsser Case: AI Bias Test with Three Models
A nine-day experiment queries ChatGPT-4o mini on the Alcàsser case: identical prompts yield three distinct AI responses, revealing significant bias.
-
Forget Matrix and Terminator: AI will just be the same old remote control
AI refuses to become the apocalypse we were promised: 99% of society will change, but the same masters will stay in charge. The story of control, now with…
-
The devil: real entity or mirror of humanity?
Belief in the devil divides literalists and symbolists; accounts of dreams and the thesis of human evil raise the deeper question.
-
ChatGPT or handcrafted? The 500-album playlist row dividing metal fans
Suspicion that a 500-album playlist was generated by ChatGPT has split music lovers. A look at the evidence, the use of Trackify and the patterns that gave it away.
-
Why I Love Jacek Yerka
A taste for Jacek Yerka is the tip of an iceberg connecting Victorian painting, German Romanticism and science fiction. Discover the hidden influences.