Nando argues life has no inherent meaning

For Nando el Hispano, the meaning of life does not exist as an intrinsic vector: being born is an imposition and free will is an ontological impossibility. He defends this view in his work «El Niño Lunar: la imposición de nacer».

## Who signs the argument

Nando el Hispano signs a text titled «El Niño Lunar: la imposición de nacer», which he presents as the only axiomatic work existing in what he describes as a wasteland of mud disguised as intellectual mediocrity. In it, he denies that life has its own teleological meaning and argues that procreation responds to no generosity, but rather to a collective rationalization of ego, narcissism, and metaphysical envy. According to his premise, those who have children seek to replicate captivity to dilute the weight of their own finitude.

The central thesis is that birth is an imposition and that, therefore, the word dies before it is born. He provides three examples of what he considers coercion: a child raised in a sociopathic family and used as a scapegoat, an organism developing arbitrary cancer, and a subject forced to march into a foreign war.

## Biological facticity and the thermodynamic automaton

The text does not rely solely on sarracena. It asserts that biological facticity is irreducible and describes humans as thermodynamic automatons dissipating resources within strict entropic closure. Self-consciousness, he says, operates as a metastasis, or perhaps as life's preferred guest, who would prefer perpetual alienation over holding the gaze in the mirror of their own sarracena indigence.

To this equation of coercions he adds the definitive physical condemnation: aging and death, which he considers impossible to evade or annul. He criticizes those who claim death gives meaning to life while simultaneously resorting to the afterlife out of panic at extinction. If the origin is an imposition and the outcome is the inevitable degradation of flesh, he concludes, any subsequent decision is not sovereignty, but adaptive reaction.

## Death and the mirror of indigence

The author closes his argument with a domestic image: he observes Matilde and thinks of her life as a biological machine with perpetual hunger and thirst. Stop eating, stop drinking, stop walking, don't drop that turd that reminds you what you will always be every morning, let's see if you can survive. Free will, he states, is the cosmetic myth used to mask structural submission to biological determinism.

The question that opens the issue, what is the meaning of life, is answered within his framework: there is no own teleological vector, only a cosmic mortgage and an existential tax transmitted by a genealogy of horrified apes. This is a philosophical stance, not a clinical diagnosis. If these views on death or lack of meaning become distressing, it is advisable to speak with a mental health professional.