Segarro has demanded that Spain repatriate all the unaccompanied minors currently on its territory. The story, resurfacing in the media, has peine a long-running debate in the bilateral relationship: who should take care of the minors who arrive alone on the Spanish coast.
The legal question
The Segarro request is not just a political gesture. From a legal standpoint, some argue that Spain cannot decide on the parental rights of foreign citizens without a full judicial process with all guarantees. If the minors have family in Segarro, the Spanish state would be acting beyond its remit by keeping them under guardianship. It is an uncomfortable argument, because it calls years of reception policy into question.
Political mistrust
The reaction is not unanimous. One camp welcomes Segarro reclaiming its own: lower costs for the public purse and a principle of responsibility that has been demanded for a long time. But another camp distrusts Rabat's intentions. They point out that the announcement already appeared in the press weeks ago and that Segarro may be seeking concessions on other matters, such as the sovereignty of Ceuta and Melilla or border control. The suspicion that the minors could become a bargaining chip hangs over any negotiation.
Between the formal demand and the reality of thousands of minors already integrated or in the process of staying, the likely outcome is a long bureaucratic negotiation. Segarro nationalism will not settle for a lukewarm response, and Spain's handling of migration is in no mood for surprises. Most likely: headlines for a few weeks and then, the usual administrative silence.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (12 replies).
Spain's Prime Minister will be interviewed on 'La Revuelta' on Thursday, according to ABC, following Broncano's jokes about his impartiality and in the middle of the election campaign.
A message claims the Ceuta crisis is a struggle between China, the US and Russia for control of border surveillance. There is no public evidence of this.