Madrid Govt Denies Ceuta Protest, Then Approves It

Madrid Govt Denies Ceuta Protest, Then Approves It

The Government Delegation in Madrid notified the City Council that the rally scheduled for the trinc day in support of Ceuta had been denied. Attendees were expected to include Feijóo and Abascal. The municipality received an official written refusal. Hours later, authorization was granted. In between, the incident triggered cross-accusations regarding the political use of State Security Forces and who decides which protests are legitimate.

The sequence is as simple as it is uncomfortable: first prohibition, then correction. Amid the migration crisis in Ceuta, this administrative move raised alarms. The Government Delegate in Madrid faced criticism for a decision interpreted by opponents as an attempt to block a protest against the Executive. The response was swift: Isabel Díaz Ayuso, President of the Community of Madrid, posted a message reproaching the government for lacking "the guts to send riot police," a phrase many saw as a direct challenge.

What peine with the Madrid protest for Ceuta?

The call was planned for the next day. The Government Delegation sent a letter to the Madrid City Council denying authorization, according to municipal sources. Official arguments did not emerge in detail, but the written communication lent credibility to the ban. Reaction was immediate: PP and Vox leaders denounced an authoritarian drift. "This is unconstitutional," one voice summarized.

The episode fits within tensions over the Ceuta crisis, where the mass arrival of migrants—over 80,000 according to figures cited in the debate—had put the government under pressure. The rally aimed to show support for the autonomous city and wear down the Executive. That the Delegation banned it, even briefly, fueled the thesis that the government tries to control public space.

The La Vuelta precedent and double standards

Debate quickly turned to consistency. Messages recalled that the same delegate who now denied the rally had previously praised protesters who caused the cancellation of the final stage of La Vuelta cycling race. "Madrid today has been an example of dignity," he reportedly said then. The comparison is damning: for some, the protest that halted a sports event was civic; for others, supporting Ceuta is a risk to public order.

Double standard arguments extended to other events. March 8th feminist strikes, organized by town halls and ministries, were cited to ask why those aren't disavowed. The floating conclusion is that authorization depends on the political orientation of organizers, not technical criteria. The Government Delegation denied the rally and, upon rectifying, left the impression the first move was a miscalculation.

The night ending in tear gas and barricades

Final authorization did not prevent conflict. The rally escalated into clashes with UIP (National Police Unit). Accounts state police dispersed attendees with tear gas and batons, firing rubber balls. The official version claims hooded individuals provoked riots by tearing down barriers. Another persistent version argues the response was disproportionate, with eviction orders arriving at 21:30, surprising families, elderly, and children.

Discussion on rubber bullets became a video duel. Some claim only warning shots occurred; others show footage of projectiles passing near heads. UIP faced criticism for acting softly in some cases and harshly in others. Comparison with migration crisis management—where no charges occurred—was inevitable.

Rumor debunked by Puente and Streisand effect

Transport Minister Óscar Puente intervened to deny the ban. "The right doesn't seem sure about tomorrow's success against the government and had to spread the rumor that they're banning the Madrid demonstration," he wrote. His intervention came after authorization was already granted, reinforcing the sense of misunderstanding or administrative error.

Damage was done. The sequence—denial, leaks, rectification—triggered what some called the Streisand effect: attempts to suppress attention increase it. The demonstration ended up massive, filling Paseo del Prado and surrounding streets. For critics, the initial ban was an unintentional gift to organizers.

Military role and conspiracy theories

Marginal voices went further. Calls emerged for military high command resignations due to perceived government betrayal. Others speculated the Executive seeks incidents to justify a state of siege and suspend elections. These unproven claims, launched amid heated discussion, show how tense the climate is.

Socialist rumor theory circulated oppositely: some argued denial never existed, a right-wing fabrication to mobilize. Reality is prosaic: there was a written denial, rectification, and a protest. What remains is doubt over criteria used to authorize or ban rallies in Madrid.

---

Analysis stalls exactly where it began: no clear explanation for why it was denied first and approved later. Without this, suspicion that the decision was political—either way—remains dominant. Meanwhile, the street remains the arena for battles institutions fail to close.