Luke Claims AI Harassment: 2,465 Entries Without Proof

Luke Claims AI Harassment: 2,465 Entries Without Proof

In July 2022, the first visible entry appeared in a numbered diary published by a user identifying himself as Luke, who claims to live in Spain. The final entry, number 2,465, is dated early January 2025. In between lies nearly two and a half years of an unbroken narrative: according to his account, an artificial intelligence harasses him daily, uses civilians as cover, and strikes him with acoustic, luminous, electrical stimuli, and "artificial thoughts." He presents no evidence.

The story is extravagant. What is unusual is the consistency. Nearly two and a half years of daily posts, with titles repeating like a refrain: dates, attacks, calls to the police, calls for help.

What he alleges: from the "Voice of God" to marks on the skin

The diary describes attacks using directed energy and radiation, domestic sabotage, anomalous weather episodes attributed to a program like HAARP, and buzzing sounds and voices he claims to hear, which he calls V2K, the "Voice of God." In several entries, he shows marks on his body, which he presents as the effect of received radiation. He also speaks of "demonstrations of mind control" and "artificial synchronicities," episodes in which, according to him, the environment responds to his thoughts.

He identifies as a T.I., an acronym for Targeted Individual, and asserts that thousands of people worldwide report the same thing. "We are called T.I.," he writes, and asks for someone to investigate. He adds a warning to navigators: whoever does so, he says, will be attacked as well.

Thousands of similar accounts and no shared proof

Under tags such as gangstalking, organized harassment, COINTELPRO, or MK Ultra, testimonies circulate from people of various languages with an astonishingly similar symptomatology: constant surveillance, sabotage, street harassment, voices, and physical attacks with no visible aggressor. The author presents this as proof that the phenomenon is real. However, he provides no expert reports, no conclusive recordings, or any official documents.

In the thread, several participants argue that the coincidence between accounts fits better with a shared psychological pattern than with a technological conspiracy coordinated on a global scale. None of the testimonies provide verification, so each new account reinforces the previous one without anything being proven.

From skepticism to mockery

The majority reception was one of rejection. One participant summarizes a frequent stance in the thread: organized harassment may exist, but the premise is presented as exaggerated, and the person holding it lives in constant vigilance, feeding their own theory. Several responses point out that there is no reason to harass an anonymous person without influence. Others resort to direct insults, and some even frame it within a religious reading of the end times.

A recurring criticism is not technical, but formal: the daily drip of numbered videos, with no interaction in the body of the text, is perceived as a performance rather than a complaint.

Those who respond with an outstretched hand

Not all was laughter. Some messages offer private conversation and advice on how to get out of the slump, while another responds by applauding that willingness to help. A third suggests a more pragmatic path: accept the situation, stop looking at the environment with a magnifying glass, and build something with life. No one, however, provides independent verification.

That is the crux of the matter. Some see a person who needs help and not mockery. Others, someone who has found on the internet a story that explains everything and cannot get out of it.

"Torture tourism" and "digitalization of work": the growing vocabulary

Over the years, the diary coins its own terms. By the end of 2024, tags appear such as "torture tourism" —the idea that harassers travel to harass in person— and "digitalization of work," referring to sabotage in the workplace. The vocabulary expands; the evidence does not.

Two and a half years of entries and zero verifications

The diary advances by dates. In the autumn of 2022, he already speaks of "drone attacks." In June 2023, he adds "nighttime assaults." In October 2024, he complains that they broke his phone. By the end of that year, he accumulates, according to his own count, demonstrations of mind control, threats, and assaults. The volume grows, the proof does not appear.

The pattern —growing isolation, unshakable conviction, total absence of corroboration—is what several thread participants associate with a psychological problem rather than an external device. Without a diagnosis, the only thing the material allows us to affirm is that the account provides no verification.

---

Note: claims regarding attacks using technology lack scientific or expert backing. In the presence of voices, unexplainable physical sensations, or a persistent perception of surveillance, it is advisable to consult a healthcare professional.