A 'Demoníacos' by Pedro Bustamante appears on Goodreads in 2019

Goodreads lists 'Demoníacos', a book by Pedro Bustamante dated 2019, the year of his disappearance. No one has seen a copy or knows who published it.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

The alleged Bustamante book that Goodreads dates to 2019

In 2019, the same year Pedro Bustamante stopped publishing and vanished, the US platform Goodreads supposedly listed a title of his: Demoníacos. The entry sits alongside the rest of his catalogue and that is, to date, the only trace. There is no copy. No publisher identified. Not a single scanned page in circulation. The finding, located in the catalogue of the American website, is the latest news about an author who had been silent for half a decade.

Around him is a community that combs through his work with forensic precision. The tally used places 98% of his videos, 95% of his articles and 100% of his collages as already located, with a commitment to publish the full list on a non-profit basis. A reasonable doubt lingers: if someone has catalogued everything that exists, why doesn't the phantom book appear among the recovered materials?

What Demoníacos is and why no one has seen a copy

The most repeated hypothesis is that it is not a normal book. It is suggested that it could be a sort of encrypted text, and those who maintain this recall that there are uncomfortable precedents that demand surgical patience to adapt to their syntax. The comparison with 'La ilustre degeneración' is not coincidental: these are works that are not read, they are deciphered.

Against that, another reading gains weight: the title could be a deliberate trace, one more piece from an author who worked with layers. Bustamante wrote about a system that, according to his framework, operates through trauma, sens and blood, with initiates and profane within the same structure. In his videos he claimed that Egypt had initiated the model of programmed kings, and that this pattern had been repeated later in contemporary heads of state. It is a corpus that cannot be verified with Google.

The day a German couple thought he was going to kill himself

There is a scene his audience always cites. Bustamante was analysing 'Corazón partío' in a German park, with the camera on, when a young couple approached him. He greeted them in German thinking they were locals, answered them in English and they asked him if he wanted to kill himself. He continued with the analysis as if nothing had peine, and later commented that they had seemed very nice for caring about him.

Shortly after, he stopped uploading videos. That coincidence, which proves nothing, orders the entire subsequent chronology. Those who trinc his work use it as the border between the Bustamante who published and the one who disappeared.

The 5 million from the unique building and the institutional commission

The other issue that sparks conversation is economic. A version circulates according to which Bustamante travelled half the world during the years of Zapatero's government and would have earned about 5 million euros with the only building he has signed, a commission linked to the socialist government. There were two partners in the studio: 2.5 million each. A millionaire by 2009.

It should be treated as what it is: a story that is repeated without documentation in sight, despite announcements that these figures will be backed by evidence. What is less open to discussion is his professional profile, because he was an architect. And from there comes the harshest argument against him: those who move in those circles end up knowing too much, and at the same time too little.

Disinformer or cult author: the rift that runs through his legacy

There are those who defend that his texts are gems and that the knowledge they convey is not within everyone's reach, and those who respond that a disinformer only needs to mix truths with lies to make the whole package seem plausible. The specific accusation: being a controlled dissident who never showed more than he was allowed to show.

His own diagnosis turns against him. He said that to reach a certain position one must first serve the agenda, and that talent comes later. He also repeated that the root of the system is immovable, that struggle is not an option and that all that remains is to let the outcome happen. For some, that is lucidity. For others, the perfect recipe for paralysis.

The mystery closes where it began. It remains to be known whether 'Demoníacos' exists, whether someone wrote it and why someone decided to date it precisely in 2019.

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (33 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

Back