Making bread at home and other strategies to stretch the budget
Karolaina, a thirty-something conscious consumer, bought a second-hand bread maker. After several attempts, she achieved bread that lasts three days without hardening, unlike industrial bread which hardens in 24 hours. Her conclusion: "Planned obsolescence also reaches bread." This is just one example of what has come to be called "lonchafinismo," an informal but growing movement of consumers who decide to buy with their heads rather than on impulse.
Where does lonchafinismo come from?
The term, coined in the late 2000s, combines "loncha" (as in sliced meat) and "finismo" (as in thrift). It was born in online communities sharing tips to stretch salaries. The idea is simple: pay less for equivalent products, avoid waste, and extend the life of things. In Spain, where the 2008 crisis hit hard, this philosophy took root. Forums – on household economics – filled with advice to rationalize spending.
The first digital comparison tools, like Carritus, allowed comparing supermarket prices in real time. Soon after, the arrival of Chinese online stores like DealExtreme offered electronics at ridiculously low prices – a set of stainless steel blades for $5.41, compared to the 15 euros it costs in Spain – which sparked interest in cross-border savings.
Concrete strategies for daily life
Lonchafinismo translates into very concrete actions. Freezing newly bought bread and thawing it an hour before eating keeps freshness without daily bakery visits. Making homemade bread with a bread maker reduces the cost to about 15 cents per piece, plus electricity. In supermarkets, the list of white-label brands equivalent to first brands is a common guide: Celta milk instead of Lidl's white label, or Panrico sliced bread under the Eroski label.
In the energy sector, it is recommended to turn off the computer monitor (an LCD consumes 25W, a CRT 70W) and not leave the router on unnecessarily. Those with old cars, like one 22 years old, prefer repairing it themselves rather than buying a new one. The maxim is "reduce, reuse, repair."
The dark side of savings
Not everything is positive. Some see lonchafinismo as a symptom of precarity: "more than essential, it will become the way of life for many," was noted. Others warn against obsessing over minimum spending, leading to "cuencoarrocismo" – a further step where one cooks only rice to save –. The thin line between smart consumption and pathological stinginess is crossed when savings cease to be an option and become a necessity imposed by the economy.
Skeptics point out that this movement only reflects the loss of purchasing power of the middle classes. Meanwhile, optimists see it as a rational response to the excesses of consumerism. The truth is that, lacking official data, lonchafinismo has created a corpus of practical knowledge allowing many families to make ends meet with less stress.
With these price differentials, logic should lead everyone to buy from Chinese stores and make their own bread. However, not everyone is willing to dedicate the time or give up the comfort of immediacy. Lonchafinismo is not for everyone, but for those who practice it, the reward goes beyond money: it is the sense of control over one's own economy.
Related forum debates