Unchosen Loneliness: 15 Cigarettes a Day and Dying Alone
A 51-year-old divorced man, with no family and poor health, was offered funeral insurance with hospital accompaniment included. It cost just over 17 euros a month. He recounted this without fuss, having friends but not wanting to bother anyone. This is the less epic side of adult loneliness, the kind that is not chosen and arrives without warning. The underlying question was posed by another: without family, friends, or a partner, where does someone like that end up?
How Much Does Living Alone Really Wear You Down?
The most repeated statistic is not an opinion. Prolonged social isolation increases the risk of premature death to levels comparable to smoking 15 cigarettes a day. It's not a metaphor: sustained loneliness is associated with depression, apathy, anxiety disorders, and accelerated cognitive decline. The body suffers from the lack of connection just as it suffers from smoke.
Those who have lived it describe it plainly. It's not that you feel bad: it's that you stop feeling altogether. A point comes when there are no tears, just a silent room. That emptiness, they say, is more dangerous than sadness because it makes no noise.
Chosen Solitude vs. Imposed Solitude: Not the Same at 20 as at 50
Here, the nuance changes everything. Some live alone by choice and defend it vehemently: no one to put up with, no one to answer to, true freedom. The problem, others counter, is that this solitude is almost always reversible. You leave it when you feel like rejoining the world. The other kind, the one not chosen, has no exit.
Age is the most significant variable. In youth, loneliness is a flirtation, possibilities seem endless, and energy masks any lack. In old age, you no longer have loneliness: loneliness has you. The analogy used is gravity: it doesn't weigh the same for someone living in a solid building as for someone whose house is falling down around them.
The 17-Euro Insurance and Loneliness as an Expense Item
The funeral insurance scenario is not a minor anecdote. It's loneliness turned into a financial product. Policies that no longer cover just the funeral, but also hospital and post-hospital accompaniment for those who have no one to care for them. Seventeen euros a month for a service previously provided by family.
That such a product exists and that a 51-year-old considers it reasonable says a lot about the market. And it's not the only indicator. The coldest calculation in the discussion measures loneliness in time, not euros: fifteen minutes every six months. For some, that's the closest they get to a face-to-face conversation in their entire lives.
Neither a Dog nor a Psalm Solves the Core Issue
Proposed solutions range from pet ownership to spirituality. A dog returns your gaze, and some claim that this companionship surpasses that achieved with people, who destroy each other for sport. Others turn directly to the transcendent: we all thirst for beauty, truth, justice.
The strongest counter-argument came from another angle: value does not depend on externals. If we are condemned to eternal dissatisfaction, it makes no difference whether you have a lot or a little. From this perspective, loneliness does not diminish a life's value, because each person assigns their own value. Difficult to refute entirely. Difficult, also, to sustain on a Sunday afternoon.
The Ending Nobody Asked For
One of the emotional triggers for this entire discussion was a specific death. James Van der Beek, the actor from Dawson's Creek, died at 48, leaving a family. What caused distress for some confirmed the opposite suspicion for others: having someone also guarantees nothing. And the unanswered question remains: if neither being alone nor being accompanied fits, which of the two lives is worth more?
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (191 replies).
Real Madrid dominates European football but struggles against a domestic league marked by controversial refereeing decisions and the narrative hegemony of FC Barcelona.