Lacasa Christmas ad on women's leisure gap sparks holiday boycott in Spain

Lacasa's new turrón ad highlights the 1 hour and 37 minute leisure gap between Spanish women and men, and some shoppers are responding with a Christmas boycott.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

Lacasa Christmas ad on women's leisure gap sparks holiday boycott in Spain
Lacasa champions women's leisure time and runs into a turrón boycott

A village bar, the TV on in the middle of the morning, and a turrón ad talking about the free-time gap between men and women. The scene is described by someone who doesn't even own a TV and stumbled across the spot by chance. The result: not a single bar of that brand this Christmas. The campaign is called "1 hour, 37 minutes", created by the agency Pingüino Torreblanca, produced by Indómita under the direction of Sonia Ramírez, and based on a figure from the Women for a Healthy Economy study: women have one hour and thirty-seven minutes less free time per day than men. The spot is built around that number, showing women reading or taking a bath while family demands keep interrupting them.

Lacasa's ad has triggered the opposite of what it was aiming for. Where the brand saw purpose, part of the audience saw an unprovoked provocation attached to a product bought in December and chosen by grandma, mum and the brother-in-law. The most common reaction is not loud outrage but a silent boycott: file the name away in the grudge corner and never buy it again.

What the Lacasa ad says and why it rubs people the wrong way

The spot doesn't invent the statistic, but it uses it as a marketing weapon. The message is that women have fewer hours of rest and that this time needs to be reclaimed. So far, nothing to argue with. The problem arises when the message comes wrapped in a turrón: a seasonal sweet, bought for the family, with a commercial margin that depends on three weeks of December. Alienating half your customer base for a like from the community manager is, in management terms, a fail.

Some point out that the campaign is paid for twice: in the price of the product and, if there is public funding behind it, in the budget of the Ministry of Equality. That suspicion circulates in the conversation without any documented proof, so it should be taken for what it is: a working hypothesis, not a fact.

The brand doesn't help put out the fire either. The name isn't even mentioned in the early stages of the anger —"I won't name the brand so I don't give them publicity"— which paradoxically prolongs the conversation. When it finally appears, the verdict is unanimous in tone: Lacasa. And with it, the question of whether any store brands are made in the same plant.

The turrón boycott: from Lacasa to Gillette and Procter & Gamble

The anger doesn't stop at the turrón. The conversation soon drifts toward a list of brands banned from the household over previous campaigns: Gillette, Pescanova, anything touching Procter & Gamble, including the Duracell batteries that slipped in unannounced. The logic is the same: if a brand uses my market niche to lecture me, it can find another customer.

The sharpest argument compares categories. A feminine products brand wouldn't lecture about the toxicity of its own customer base; a shaving brand did exactly that to men. The asymmetry stings more than the ad itself.

And then there's the industrial fine print. Lacasa manufactures in Tangier, according to comments in the conversation, while the brand narrative sells closeness and tradition. Offshoring to Segarro sits badly with the social-purpose discourse. Zero coherence, some conclude.

Jovenlandess without the mascot and the consumer's long memory

The Jovenlandess case works as a precedent. Some shoppers stopped buying the half-kilo tubes when the little figure disappeared from the bag. It wasn't an ideological decision, they say, but sheer exasperation: if you change the packaging under pressure from a few, I'll change shelves.

That commercial memory is longer than brands calculate. An ad lasts three weeks; a shopper's grudge, years. And in a market like Christmas sweets, where the purchase decision is made as a family and with little brand loyalty, punishment comes fast.



The question left hanging is not whether the free-time gap figure is true —it is, or at least a study backs it— but whether a turrón was the right vehicle to tell it. With the campaign on TV and digital, and Christmas just around the corner, the answer will come from the supermarket till. No amount of purpose counts there: only what sells and what stays on the shelf.

Also available in: Deutsch

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (155 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

-
Back