You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Junts floats no-confidence motion with PP and Vox, but few believe it
Junts threatens to back a no-confidence motion by Spain's PP and Vox against Pedro Sánchez, but scepticism prevails: analysts see a bluff to curb Aliança Catalana and extract concessions.
Junts waves the no-confidence motion: theatre or real strategy?
The Catalan independence party Junts per Catalunya has floated the possibility of backing a no-confidence motion against Pedro Sánchez, agreed with Spain's PP and Vox, with the stated aim of triggering early elections. But scepticism dominates the analysis: most voices see it as a bluff to extract concessions from the government and stem the loss of votes to Aliança Catalana, Silvia Orriols' party, which is eating into their ground from the identitarian right.
The move comes at a critical moment for Sánchez, besieged by judicial investigations and the fragmentation of his investiture majority. The key piece is the suplicatorio (a request for parliamentary authorisation to prosecute a sitting official): if the Supreme Court asks Congress for permission to investigate the prime minister, the chamber's Bureau – controlled by PSOE and Sumar – could block it. But if Junts joins the opposition majority, the picture would change. Some calculations suggest that an alliance of PP, Vox, Junts, UPN and CC, with the PNV abstaining, would add up to nearly 200 MPs.
Antiestéticar of Aliança Catalana
The rise of Aliança Catalana, with a Sigma Dos poll for El Mundo projecting a stunning breakthrough, explains Junts' move. Puigdemont's party is watching its most radical electorate shift towards Orriols, and knows that if Sánchez serves out the term, the haemorrhage will be irreversible. Hence the demand for immediate elections, even though nobody believes they will actually happen. "They don't want elections, they don't want to lose votes," sums up one strand of analysis.
The suplicatorio as a weapon
The debate over the suplicatorio adds tension. If the Congress Bureau rejects it, the Supreme Court could not investigate the prime minister while in office, fuelling perceptions of impunity. But if the opposition manages to force it through, Sánchez's dirty laundry and that of his allies – including the alleged corruption case involving José Luis Ábalos – could come to light. Junts is covering its back: it says it wants elections but does not table a no-confidence motion with an alternative candidate. "Junts says it wants elections, but does not support the only legal means of bringing them about," it is pointed out.
Political uncertainty weighs on the Spanish economy, which needs stability to absorb European funds and maintain market confidence. For now, Junts' move smells more of electoral survival than a genuine bid for a change of government. Time is short: some messages gave a 72-hour deadline. But in the end, as one analysis notes, "there will be no elections and it will cost the rest of Spain's people money."
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (86 replies).
Pedro Sánchez ridiculed Feijóo in Spain's Congress. The failed investiture and political tension carry an economic cost that is already showing in the indicators.
The clock change promised energy savings and no one has found them. The real debate is whether we prefer to wake up with sunlight or have long evenings.
Rajoy promised not to raise taxes, then pushed VAT up to 21% with a 9.4% deficit. Spain's debt went from 1.16 to 1.76 trillion euros: who pays for the party?