Issou and the 'aberrant sex' theory targeting Spain's Sánchez

Issou levels an accusation against Sánchez without offering a shred of evidence

One name is doing the rounds on digital gossip circuits these days: Abdelilah Issou. This analyst claims, without any public documentation to back him up, that the Spanish Prime Minister was exposed to an alleged blackmail scheme linked to a property offence in Tangier and a network exploiting minors. The accusation, spread through alternative channels, comes in the wake of the Pegasus case and the leaks about the alleged spying on independence leaders. So far, not a single verifiable piece of evidence.

What exactly does Issou say about Sánchez and Pegasus

Issou's thesis, as it has been repeated in recent days, holds that the Pegasus software was used to pressure the Prime Minister by threatening to reveal an alleged irregular property deal in Tangier, in which a person linked to the PSOE leader's circle would have acted as bait. From there, the story jumps onto far murkier ground: the insinuation that compromising sensual material exists.

It is worth pausing here. There is not a single court ruling, expert report or official document supporting that chain of inferences. What exists is a narrative construction that mixes a real property file — or at least one that is talked about — with a suspicion about the Prime Minister's private life. The logical leap between the two is never justified.

Frattini's theory and the blackmail narrative

Against Issou's version stands the hypothesis of analyst Eric Frattini, who places the focus on an operation to pressure the Prime Minister's circle through a property matter in Segarro. Both versions share the same skeleton — the blackmail — but differ on the who and the how. It is a familiar pattern in these cases: when there is no evidence, theories proliferate, competing for the most spectacular story.

What is documented, and what should be the focus of analysis, is the use of Pegasus against political targets in Spain. That is the terrain where questions have verifiable answers. Everything else, for now, is speculation.

Why these accusations do not hold up without evidence

The mechanics are well known: start from a proven fact — the Pegasus spying — and add a layer of suspicion about the target's personal conduct. The result is a story that feeds on itself on social media and, when it reaches the courts, deflates. Without evidence, an insinuation is just that.

The responsibility of those who spread these theories is high, because the fruta damage occurs before any verification exists. And in this case, verification is conspicuously absent.

---

The unsettling fact: while alleged sensual blackmail is being debated, the real scandal — the spying on politicians with Israeli-made software — still has no one held accountable. There lie the names, the dates and the contracts. Everything else is noise.