Is Palestine a myth or a reality? The ongoing debate

An analysis of whether Palestine existed as a nation, revisiting a 2010 article featuring Arab leaders' quotes and a timeline of violence.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

Is Palestine a historical myth? The article challenging the national narrative

Does a Palestinian people with ancient roots truly exist? The thesis claiming Palestine is a contemporary invention is not new, but the article by Francis Nadizi —actually a translation of a text by Joseph Farah— presents it bluntly: there was never a Palestinian state, a distinct language, or a national identity before the 20th century. However, historical data is more complex, and the debate remains deeply entrenched.

Evidence of the "myth": Arab leaders denied Palestine existed

One of the most powerful arguments used by proponents of the myth thesis is the statements made by Arab leaders prior to 1948. Two key quotes are cited in the debate: in 1937, Auni Bey Abdul-Hadi told the Peel Commission that "there is no country called Palestine. It is a term invented by the Zionists." Historian Philip Hitti concluded in 1946: "There is no such thing as Palestine in history, absolutely not." These claims, difficult to refute, clash with the subsequent reality: a people who have developed a national identity in exile and under occupation.

The critical response: an identity forged through conflict

Countering the invention narrative, another school of thought maintains that Palestinian identity was forged precisely as a reaction to Zionism and the creation of Israel. The UN partitioned a territory that was not a state, but a region of the Ottoman Empire. Refugees—more than 5 million according to some sources—are living proof of a rooted Arab population. Parallels with Al-Ándalus are used to point out that historical rights do not expire, but also to ridicule claims based on millennia of possession.

A timeline of violence hindering peace

The list of attacks mentioned in the thread—12 dead on a bus in 1956, 12 in a Jerusalem market in 1968, 12 on a school bus in 1970, 26 at Tel Aviv airport in 1972—shows that the conflict is not just about narratives. Violence has been constant on both sides. However, discussions about who started it first rarely lead anywhere.

The debate closes with a tone oscillating between irony and skepticism. Some participants go as far as to claim that both Israel and Palestine are artificial states, and that the only reality is the suffering of the civilian population. The original 2010 article, rescued years later, remains a minefield. In the end, the only solid myth is that anyone could resolve it with an article.

Related debates in the forum
  • Yes, the left will win the narrative again due to the stupidity of the right on the Palestinian issue. · 125 replies

Also available in: Deutsch

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (103 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

-
Back