How to Build the Perfect Electoral Program

A three-step method turns electoral promises into verifiable decisions using conditional logic and input/output tasks.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

The perfect electoral program is not improvised; it is built by analyzing the past, present, and future, specifying where, when, how much, and why, and writing each measure as a conditional rule like "if A is true and B is false, then do X."

An electoral program is often just a list of good intentions without a mechanism. The proposal circulating recently in entrepreneur forums takes a different approach: treat it as a decision system, not a brochure.

## Think Before Promising

The first step is thinking. Past, present, and future, with perspective and focus. It sounds abstract, but has a concrete translation: before writing a single measure, you must know where you come from, what you are doing, and what you want to achieve. Without that diagnosis, any promise is a shot in the dark.

## Specify Where, When, and How Much

The second step is specification. Where, when, how much, and why. Four questions that turn an intention into a measurable commitment. A program that does not answer those four questions is not a program: it is a wish.

## Write with True/False Conditions

The third step makes the difference. It involves defining an input checklist with statements that can only be true or false (Is A = true or false? Is B = true or false?) and, based on that, setting input tasks: if A is true and B is true, do this; if A is true and B is false, do that; and so on for all four possible combinations.

The same scheme repeats in the output: an output checklist with its own conditions and tasks. The result is a program that does not promise results, but specifies what will be done in each scenario. It is the difference between "we will lower taxes" and "if the deficit is X and growth is Y, we will lower taxes in this way; otherwise, we will do this other thing."

## Why This Method Fits Entrepreneurs

Those who manage a company already reason this way: if costs rise and demand falls, I adjust here; if costs rise and demand holds, I adjust there. Translating that logic to an electoral program does not guarantee compliance, but at least makes visible when a promise has been broken. And in politics, that is already a lot.

Also available in: Deutsch

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (8 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

-
Back