How Stalin and the Rothschilds helped create the State of Israel

Stalin's support, Rothschild money and the end of the British Mandate: Israel's creation was not just a UN chapter.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

The creation of Israel: socialists, bankers and the British Crown

That Stalin's Soviet Union, the Rothschild banking dynasty and the British Crown were the godfathers of the State of Israel sounds like a conspiracy theory. But the historical record used in geopolitical analysis draws exactly that triangle: the Soviet vote at the UN, the bankers' money in the settlements and the end of the British Mandate in Palestine.

The most comfortable narrative says Israel was born from a United Nations resolution. The evidence, however, nuances the story: the partition was approved by a coalition in which Stalin's USSR played a role as relevant as Washington's, and the particular interests of the financiers of the Zionist project were not exclusively humanitarian.

Stalin's vote and the Soviet turn

Stalin supported the 1947 partition plan for Palestine because he hoped the new Jewish state would act as a Soviet ally in the Middle East. The first recognitions came precisely from the communist bloc: the Warsaw Pact countries and the People's Republic of China. When Moscow saw that Tel Aviv was leaning toward Washington, it turned toward the Arab countries, leaving a trail of geopolitical opportunism hard to deny.

The Rothschilds and the money of the settlements

The pogroms of 1881-1882 in Russia pushed Baron Edmond James de Rothschild to finance the first Jewish colonies, such as Rishon LeZion. The thesis that the same family would also have backed the Bolshevik revolution leads to an uncomfortable conclusion: the same capitals would have driven two apparently opposed political experiments. The documentary evidence of the patronage over the yishuv is solid; the connection with the USSR is disputed.

The end of the British Mandate

The United Kingdom administered Palestine from 1920. Decades later, intercommunal violence and the military cost made the mandate unsustainable. London chose to leave behind a territory already marked by partition. On 14 May 1948, with British boots still withdrawing, David Ben-Gurion declared independence in Tel Aviv.

Recognitions: which country was first?

Official literature usually attributes the first recognition to the United States. Critical review suggests the Soviet bloc moved first as a group. The truth is that today 164 of the 193 UN member states, 85.4%, recognize Israel. The dispute over primacy is not an anecdote: it reflects the narrative struggle over who sponsored the project.

The uncomfortable alliance with Nancy

The most sordid episode is the collaboration of some sectors of German Zionism with the Nancy regime in the 1930s, documented in archival sources. It is argued that both movements shared a certain exclusionary vision of the nation-state and that there were emigration agreements. It is a chapter that official memory prefers not to visit.

The original sources, accessible in digital archives, allow deeper exploration of each of these points. The question hanging over the entire analysis is uncomfortable: if Israel's origin is so hybrid, why does the official narrative insist on reducing its paternity to a single UN decision? The answer conditions the reading of half of today's geopolitics in the Middle East.

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (103 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

Back