Hisense fridge wins sales with low energy use

The Hisense RB390N4BWC costs €599 and uses 155 kWh/year, unlike the Miele at €899 and 238 kWh. Durability remains uncertain.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

The fridge using 155 kWh a year whose lifespan is unknown

A 599-euro Hisense combi fridge leads sales on El Corte Inglés’s website with an energy label that outperforms almost all its competitors: 155 kWh per year and 35 dB of noise. The data is striking. Any rival in a similar price range exceeds 200 kWh annually and is louder. On paper, there is no debate.

The issue arises when asking about what is not on the energy label. Compressor durability, spare parts availability in five years, and the actual quality of the electronics. That is where consensus ends and a discussion begins that is essentially the same as always: buying cheap and good, or paying for the brand backing it.

Energy consumption and noise levels of comparable models

The figures discussed are easy to organize. The Hisense RB390N4BWC consumes 155 kWh/year and claims 35 dB. The Bosch KGN36VWED rises to 238 kWh/year and 39 dB, costing 100 euros more. The Miele KFN 4374 ED has the same consumption figure as the Bosch —238 kWh/year—, also 39 dB, and its price is 899 euros with a three-year warranty.

The difference in consumption between the Hisense and the other two is not minor: it represents a 53% higher annual electricity cost for Bosch and Miele. Translated into bills, the savings from the cheaper model are real and verifiable. Whether this offsets the risk of breakdowns is another matter.

Durability: the data missing from any label

This is where the analysis breaks down. One participant summarizes their family experience with a Sharp fridge that is in its seventh year, while their Bosch failed one month after the warranty expired. Another points to a Zanussi combi that has been running for nearly 38 years in a relative's home, something considered unthinkable today. Some argue that a current fridge will be worse than one made in five years, so initial savings may compensate for a shorter lifespan.

The brand guarantees nothing. This conclusion is repeated through different paths: an LG from 20 years ago still works, a Balay has gone six years without complaints, a Samsung is in its ninth year, a Hisense has lasted four years without issues, and a Beko lasted exactly one year. There is no correlation between price and longevity.

The insurance and extended warranty argument

One line of analysis in the discussion involves home insurance. If the appliance fails and repair is too expensive, the policy should cover the repair or pay a proportionate part of the residual value. This argument reduces the risk of buying cheap, although it depends on each contract's conditions and the appliance's age.

In contrast, the stance of paying more for a premium brand relies on commercial warranties and technical service networks. Three years in the case of Miele, with a price nearly double that of Hisense. The question is whether those three years of coverage justify a 300-euro difference.

Miele, Bosch, or Hisense: what buyers say

Experience with Miele in other appliances is positive: a dishwasher working daily for seven years without complaints. With Bosch, however, some describe pogre deterioration until the motor seized at ten years. The German brand is no longer perceived as it once was.

Regarding Hisense, the most repeated reference is a 55-inch OLED TV approaching three years without problems. The conclusion drawn is that the Chinese manufacturer dominates consumer electronics, and the reasonable doubt is whether this competence translates to cooling. The Hisense model sold at El Corte Inglés is also advertised with a 10-year warranty on the compressor, a detail absent in the other two compared models.

What to check before deciding: net volume and freezing capacity

The most technical advice given is to stop looking at the energy label and focus on net volume and the kilos the appliance freezes in 24 hours. The Miele declares 10 kg/24h versus the Bosch's 6 kg/24h, a substantial difference if you freeze often. Other antiestéticatures, including noise, take a back seat.

It is also noted that a single unit with low cooling capacity makes less noise and uses less energy simply because it cools more slowly. In other words, low consumption or decibel figures may indicate a less powerful appliance rather than better technology.

The unanswered question

With 155 kWh/year and 599 euros, the Hisense wins any efficiency and price comparison. With 238 kWh/year and 899 euros, the Miele wins in freezing capacity and brand fruta. No one has yet proven which of the two will still be working in fifteen years. And that is, exactly, the question no energy label answers.

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (25 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

Back