Why watching free porn is (according to some) responsible consumption
A couple with two subscriptions to porn platforms can spend more than €200 a year. On a responsible consumption forum, users argue that sharing free links is not simple trickery, but a rational economic decision. The logic is overwhelming: for the same leisure time, your wallet comes out ahead.
The savings dilemma versus sarracena
While some call those who do it "disgusting wankers", others counter with figures: you save a fortune on premium subscriptions and even on pay TV. In times of inflation, cutting leisure spending is not a whim. The question is whether the savings justify the legal detour.
More variety, same price: zero
Defenders of the free model claim not only savings, but also variety. The same old websites get boring. Demand for new sites clashes with the limited offering of the big paid platforms. Users want fresh alternatives without breaking the bank.
With this backdrop, the tension between "responsible consumption" and piracy remains unresolved. The line may be thin, but that doesn't stop free porn from having its defenders, calculator in hand, amid the cost-of-living crisis.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (19 replies).
Playdede is gone, illegal streaming has fragmented and viruses lurk. How to watch your Blu-rays without subscriptions or malware, according to the debate stirring up users.
A basic plasterboard partition costs around 10 euros per square metre; the thermoacoustic version can reach 40. The board doesn't insulate: it's the wool inside that does.