Forum User Proposes Europe-China Alliance to Counter US and Russia

Europe and China: The Alliance Reshaping the Global Board

A popular online thesis argues that Europe and China are the two great civilizational blocks, while the US and Russia act as destructive empires. A highly engaged analysis claims a strategic alliance between Brussels and Beijing would completely neutralize Washington and Moscow. This idea, though not new, has become uncomfortably timely.

The Argument of Two Civilizational Blocks

The core premise states that Europe and China have always been civilization's creators, while the US and Russia have fragmented the continent. The author details historical events, from the American wars of independence to the division of Africa and Asia, arguing they aimed to destroy European influence. The conclusion identifies a "common enemy," asserting China has never harmed Europe.

Russia's Role and the Break with Moscow

The proposal creates immediate fractures. Critics argue that China and Russia are allies, making a break with Moscow unrealistic. One top-voted response dismisses the idea of China abandoning Russia for the "US." Others note that China's Belt and Road Initiative aims to connect the two blocks, while the US has systematically tried to separate Russia and China.

The Division of Central Asia and the Far East

The analysis goes beyond trade, proposing an explicit territorial division. It suggests China should reclaim the Indus Valley, Bengal, and Himalayan microstates, and return Balochistan to Persia. The underlying idea is that a Europe-China pincer movement would allow actors to recover pending territories. It also includes the Middle East, proposing unified Arabia, Mesopotamia, and Persia as stable partners.

Internal Criticisms and Skepticism

Not all feedback is enthusiastic. Skeptics argue that aligning with Beijing is naive or dangerous. Others claim the real issue is immigration, suggesting Europe should control borders and restore birth rates instead of seeking distant allies. Some argue that European governments freely choose southern invasions, while others note the US has shifted the financial burden of potential conflict with Russia onto Europe.

The Context: Tariffs, Greenland, and Ukraine

The analysis occurs amidst commercial tension. Threats of US tariffs on European VAT have revived debates on economic dependence. Responses call for reciprocity, banning US companies like Facebook, Amazon, Google, and Tesla. The war in Ukraine, Greenland ambitions, and the post-war division without Brussels have convinced many that the mask has fallen. The question remains whether Europe has the political will to seek alternative partners or remain subordinate to Washington.