Feijóo challenges Sánchez over judge investigating his brother

Alberto Núñez Feijóo has demanded public explanations from Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez concerning the judge investigating his brother, a parliamentary offensive that strengthens his opposition profile. The PSOE has not responded to this specific question.

The question posed by **Alberto Núñez Feijóo** to the head of government is no ordinary interpellation. "Who within the PSOE ordered the removal of the judge investigating his brother?" He formulated it in parliament, and **EL ESPAÑOL** reported it. The phrase contains two parts: an implicit accusation and a demand for political responsibility.

## What is being asked of Sánchez

The PP leader does not ask about the merits of the case, but about the chain of command. He wants to know if anyone within the **PSOE** pulled strings to sideline the magistrate handling the investigation affecting **David Sánchez**, the prime minister's brother. This is a question that cannot be answered with a generic "no."

The judge is investigating the assets of the president's brother. Feijóo shifts the focus from the suspect to those who might have attempted to influence the investigation. It is a qualitative leap: the debate is no longer about the case itself, but about the integrity of the procedure.

## Why it matters economically

Political corruption cases have a measurable economic cost. They affect the risk premium, investor confidence, and the legislative agenda. A government that spends energy defending itself loses capacity to pass budgets and reforms.

The PP has been exploiting this angle for months. The strategy is not just judicial, but electoral. Each appearance by Feijóo in Congress aims to establish the idea of an executive willing to protect its own. For now, the PSOE has not given a direct answer to that specific question.

## Feijóo's opposition strategy

Feijóo has changed his tone. He has moved from gestural moderation to direct confrontation. The question about the judge is an example: short, concrete, and difficult to dodge without appearing evasive. It is not a speech, but a dart.

This shift involves calculation. The center-right voter who left for **VOX** wants to see firmness. Feijóo tries to win them back without breaking with moderate voters. The parliamentary question is the tool: it raises the volume without abusa the rules.

## A clash not resolved in the chamber

The response will not come in the form of a decree. It will arrive, if it arrives, in the courts or through an investigative commission. Meanwhile, the PP has ammunition for months of control sessions. The PSOE faces a narrative problem: every time they do not answer, the question sounds louder.

The government's economic policy depends on its political stability. And that stability is measured, in part, by the ability to answer uncomfortable questions. This one certainly is.