EU Forum Rumors Claim Vote to Probe Puigdemont

EU Reportedly Votes to Investigate Puigdemont Case After 48-Hour Disappearance

According to forum posts, the European Parliament approved a majority vote to open an investigation into the Catalan independence movement and its alleged contacts with Russia. The central figure in this matter did not attend the vote, again according to these same messages. Puigdemont would have been unreachable for 48 hours, while rumors have already assigned him a vehicle: the trunk of a Dacia. What until recently seemed unthinkable—that Brussels would look at the *procés* (Catalan independence process) with different eyes—has become, according to the most circulating version, a complete script reversal.

What Did Europe Vote On and Why?

The initiative passed by majority. The focus would be on events described by some as violent acts during the independence challenge and, above all, on agreements that promoters allegedly maintained with the Russian Wagner mercenary group. That detail, the Russian connection, is what shifted the ground. According to circulating versions, documents, photographs, and audio recordings were decisive in overturning the narrative, to the point of strengthening the position of the judge handling the case.

There is more fog than certainty regarding figures. The thread claims that the list of people treated by health services exceeded five digits and that this list did not include all deceased individuals. These are assertions traveling without firm resolution and should be read as what they are: disputed versions.

The Russian Factor and the Polonium Ghost

The trail of Russian money is not new, but here it has moved from rumor to central argument. There is talk of meetings with emissaries and support that allegedly arrived from Moscow to sustain the independence project. The reaction of some is pure sarcasm: if the connection is confirmed, the next logical step would be for the protagonist to suffer what peine to others who got too close to certain windows. Black table-talk humor, but it depicts where distrust is heading.

Striking is the role of the European Union itself. The same institution that gave him shelter in Brussels for years now appears willing to dig into the case. This contradiction—sheltering first, investigating later—is what generates the most indignation, and also what is repeated most often.

The Catalan Letter Brussels Returned

The anecdote of these days concerns language. According to a message in the thread, the protagonist allegedly sent a letter to Brussels written in Catalan and was told that this language is not official in Europe; that he should resend it in Spanish and only then, perhaps, receive a response after the carnival weekend. Seemingly minor. In a matter where every gesture is measured, the response is read as a clear snub.

Sánchez in the Equation

In the internal political sphere, the hypothesis some consider is that the investigation could end up implicating Pedro Sánchez, whom one participant points out for his dependence on independentist support. On the table is even a figure that sounds like an segarro: preventive pardons, an anticipated shield in case proceedings arrive. None of this is confirmed; it is posed as a possible scenario, not as fact.

Amnesty remains the knot. As one participant summarizes, those who pact with the investigated stay in power; those who do not pact lose their majority. This crude calculation runs through the case from top to bottom and explains why the Catalan issue never fully closes.

The Dacia Trunk

The protagonist’s fate has become a game. Rumors suggest a flight to Southeast Asia; others place Vietnam at the bottom of a Dacia trunk. The joke has gone so far that there is already banter about a model with an enlarged trunk, the Coup-Plotter Dacia. Behind the joke lies a serious question: if there is a European investigation underway, where does someone go who maintains an office in the European Parliament itself?

And the connection with amnesty is not casual. There is irony suggesting that if certain behaviors are covered via the independence route, any similar case would struggle to be judged. The joke about Barbate drug traffickers, repeated throughout the conversation, points exactly to that.

How the Conversation Evolved

It started as a foreign policy matter and ended as an internal settling of scores. The first stretch focused on the European Parliament and the Russian factor. Then came rumors about whereabouts, the trunk, and the Catalan letter. The full description of that list, with names and consequences, merits an analysis that does not fit here. In the final part, the focus shifted to Sánchez and amnesty, with the feeling that whoever seemed untouchable is beginning to become a burden.

And now what? If Europe investigates but does not condemn, if the Russian file is proven or remains just that—a file—does anyone pay the bill, or does everything return to its place?