Elisa Mouliaá Gathers More Testimonies Against Errejón

Mouliaá Gathers More Testimonies Against Errejón

Elisa Mouliaá is not alone. At least two other women have contacted her claiming similar experiences with Íñigo Errejón, according to messages the actress has shared during the public tracking of the case. One woman states that her ex-partner, a friend of the politician, left her deaf in one ear and with broken ribs, adding she possesses "deplorable videos of Íñigo." The other reports suspicions of being drugged: the next day, only flashes remained.

The case, still under investigation, has shifted from an individual complaint to a trickle of cross-referenced testimonies. It has also become a major political problem for someone who built much of their public capital on the banner of believing victims.

What Do the New Testimonies Sent to Mouliaá Say?

The first account, circulated as a summary of a private conversation, comes from a woman who claims she declared "open war" against Errejón about two years ago when she realized "what he really was." Her testimony includes a warning to the actress: you are not alone and you are not imagining things. She describes the politician as a manipulator capable of making anyone believe he would never do such a thing, speaking of a "terrifying psychopathy" when the puzzle pieces come together.

The second message, transcribed literally, comes from a person who says they were partners with one of Errejón's best friends. They claim their ex-partner left them deaf in one ear and with broken ribs, and that they retain recordings of the politician in a deplorable state. They also mention a video where, allegedly, Errejón arrives at a venue in the party car after drinking, hitting the vehicles in front and behind until having to park elsewhere.

None of these accounts have been judicially validated. They are partial testimonies, released in the context of an open case, and must be read as such.

The Judge's Question: Believing Victims When You Are the Accused

The investigating judge, Adolfo Carretero, asked Errejón about a contradiction highlighted by the case itself. He reminded him that he advocated for believing women's complaints, but now, when it concerns him, he tries to dismantle them. This is the political core of the matter: the doctrine of "I believe you" applied to its preacher.

Added to this is the fact most uncomfortable within his own sphere: according to these accounts, the politician attended March 8th demonstrations while, always according to the accusations, behaving in a manner incompatible with what was claimed there.

What Is Discussed Publicly: Evidence, Narrative, and Double Standards

Public discourse has split into several currents. One argues that until there is a judicial ruling, only indications and versions exist, and that the media trial has already condemned prematurely. Another responds that the presumption of innocence is invoked here with an enthusiasm not applied when others were accused, and that the criteria should be the same for everyone.

There is a third line, more uncomfortable for Errejón himself: the one recalling that he contributed to designing the legal framework now applied to him, and that the comprehensive guarantee law for sensual freedom—known as the "only yes is yes" law—was a banner of his political space. Asking for guarantees now is read, in that sector, as an accountability reckoning.

And a fourth, transversal line points to the system: the feeling that media and judicial treatment depends less on facts than on affiliation. That some pass through police stations and others do not. This is the suspicion running through any named case, and it has spiked here.

The Car Video and the Rest of the List

Among the materials these women claim to have, the most cited is the parking lot video. A clip where, according to the account, Errejón arrives driving a party vehicle after drinking and hits the cars in front and behind. If confirmed, the episode would mix two planes: the private and the use of public resources.

The list of testimonies the actress says she has received also includes other women with whom, always according to these versions, the politician would have been involved. The exact number is not closed. Each new account adds a piece, and none, so far, has reached a firm resolution.

What Could Happen Next

The procedure remains under investigation. Errejón maintains his defense and has not been convicted of any of the attributed acts. The case pogre without a clear end date, and the trickle of testimonies, if it continues, can reopen the media case every few weeks.

It is foreseeable that the matter will become fully judicialized: parties requesting procedures, videos being provided or discarded, and testimonies passing the filter they have not yet passed. If any of those materials are accredited, the nature of the case changes. If not, it will remain another chapter in Spain's political war, with cross-accusations and no sentence. Politics, meanwhile, has already collected its bill.